E. & J. Gallo Winery et al v. Toledo Engineering Co., Inc.

Filing 127

AMENDED 126 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 92 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues; granting in part and denying in part 95 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 112 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim subject to conditions stated in court, signed by District Judge Sam E. Haddon on 4/23/2013. (Gaumnitz, R)

2
3

4
5
6
7

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
II

E & J GALLO WINERY,

12

CASE NO. CV F 11-0476-SEH-GSA

Plaintiff,
AMENDED ORDER

13
14

VS.

TOLEDO ENGINEERING CO., INC.,

15

Defendant.

16

I

17

The Court's Order of April 22, 2013,' is amended as follows:

18

Upon the record made in open court on April 22, 2013,

19

ORDERED:

20

1.

21

22
23

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues2 is GRANTED in part and

DENIED in part as stated on the record.
2.

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment' is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part

as stated on the record.

24
25
26

I

Document No. 126.

27

2

Document No. 92.

28

l

Document No. 101.
1

1
2
3

3.

Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim4 is GRANTED subject to the

conditions stated in open cJ}:
DATED this ~ day of April, 2013.

~L&.t~

4
5
6

United States District Judge

7

8
9

10

11
12
13
14

15
16
17

18
19
20

21
22

23
24
25
26
27

28

4

Document No. 112.

2