E. & J. Gallo Winery et al v. Toledo Engineering Co., Inc.

Filing 53

STIPULATION and ORDER re Modification of Pretrial Scheduling Conference Order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/15/2012. (Martinez, A)

Download PDF
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP DAVID S WORTHINGTON, SB# 73233 2 ANDREW E. BENZINGER, SB# 219380 MELISSA M. WHITEHEAD, SB# 262123 3 2850 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 450 Sacramento, California 95833 4 Telephone: 916.564.5400 Facsimile: 916.564.5444 5 KERGER & HARTMANN, LLC 6 RICHARD M. KERGER, Pro Hac Vice 33 S. Michigan Street, Suite 100 7 Toledo, Ohio 43604 Telephone: 419.255.5990 8 Facsimile: 419.255.5997 9 Attorneys for Defendant TOLEDO ENGINEERING CO., INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 13 E. & J. GALLO WINERY, a California corporation, 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 TOLEDO ENGINEERING CO., INC., an 17 Ohio corporation, and DOES I through XX, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00476-LJO-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER Trial Date: May 13, 2013 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff E. & J. GALLO WINERY and 21 Defendant TOLEDO ENGINEERING CO., INC., as follows: 22 In order to facilitate Defendant’s scheduling of depositions of Plaintiff’s employees, 23 Martin Rhodes and Jeff Wilson, the parties jointly request that this Court modify its pretrial 24 Scheduling Conference Order and re-set discovery deadlines as follows: 25 BISGAAR D 2. Expert Disclosure Deadline: November 15, 2012 27 BRISBOI S October 29, 2012 26 LEWI S 1. Fact Discovery Cut-Off: 3. Supplemental Expert Disclosure: December 5, 2012 28 4. Expert Discovery Cut-Off: December 21, 2012 4851-9030-1713.1 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER The parties agree that there is good cause for this modification, in light of the already 1 2 congested deposition schedule in this matter, which includes at least seven depositions already 3 scheduled between October 5 and 15, 2012, to take place in three different cities. The parties do 4 not intend or agree that the extension provided for by this stipulation shall be used to propound 5 any additional non-expert discovery. The parties also agree that this stipulation is not intended to resolve all issues previously 6 7 raised in Defendant’s Motion to Modify Scheduling Conferencing Order, currently scheduled for 8 hearing on October 26, 2012. Rather, this stipulation, if approved by the Court, shall be an agreed 9 upon modification, pending the Court’s ruling on that Motion. The parties reserve all of their 10 arguments concerning that motion. 11 12 DATED: October 15, 2012 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP By: 13 /s/ Melissa M. Whitehead Melissa M. Whitehead Attorneys for Defendant TOLEDO ENGINEERING CO., INC. 14 15 16 DATED: October 15, 2012 17 COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY LLP By: /s/ Steven N. Williams Steven N. Williams Attorneys for Plaintiff E. & J. GALLO WINERY 18 19 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// LEWI S BRISBOI S BISGAAR D 28 /// 4851-9030-1713.1 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER 1 /// 2 ORDER 3 4 In light of the stipulation, and for good cause showing, the Court orders as follows: 5 1. To allow for the taking of depositions of Mr. Rhodes and Mr. Wilson, fact 6 discovery shall be cut-off on October 29, 2012; and 7 2. The parties are required to disclose expert witnesses by November 15, 2012. 8 Supplemental expert witness disclosure, if any, shall be served by December 5, 2012. Expert 9 discovery shall be completed on or before December 21, 2012. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: 13 October 15, 2012 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 14 6i0kij8d 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWI S BRISBOI S BISGAAR D 28 4851-9030-1713.1 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?