Morales v. M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III L.P., et al.
Filing
8
ORDER re 7 Notice of Voluntary DISMISSAL OF M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III L.P. ONLY; DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/20/2011. (Martin, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Attorneys for Plaintiff
John Morales
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
M & H REALTY PARTNERS AFFILIATED )
)
FUND III L.P., et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
JOHN MORALES,
No. 1:11-CV-00479-LJO-SMS
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
OF M & H REALTY PARTNERS
AFFILIATED FUND III L.P. ONLY
18
WHEREAS, no defendant has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment;
19
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has incorrectly named M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III
20
L.P. in this action;
21
WHEREAS, no counterclaim has been filed;
22
Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests that Defendant M & H Realty Partners Affiliated
23
Fund III L.P. only be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
24
41(a)(1)(A)(i).
25
Date: April 20, 2011
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
26
27
28
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff John Morales
Morales v. M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III L.P., et al.
Request for Dismissal; Order
Page 1
1
ORDER
2
Good cause appearing,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that only M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III L.P. be
4
5
dismissed with prejudice from this action.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
10
11
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
April 20, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
b9ed48bb
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Morales v. M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III L.P., et al.
Request for Dismissal; Order
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?