Morales v. M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III L.P., et al.

Filing 8

ORDER re 7 Notice of Voluntary DISMISSAL OF M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III L.P. ONLY; DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/20/2011. (Martin, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Attorneys for Plaintiff John Morales 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) M & H REALTY PARTNERS AFFILIATED ) ) FUND III L.P., et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) JOHN MORALES, No. 1:11-CV-00479-LJO-SMS NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF M & H REALTY PARTNERS AFFILIATED FUND III L.P. ONLY 18 WHEREAS, no defendant has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment; 19 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has incorrectly named M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III 20 L.P. in this action; 21 WHEREAS, no counterclaim has been filed; 22 Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests that Defendant M & H Realty Partners Affiliated 23 Fund III L.P. only be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 25 Date: April 20, 2011 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 26 27 28 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff John Morales Morales v. M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III L.P., et al. Request for Dismissal; Order Page 1 1 ORDER 2 Good cause appearing, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that only M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III L.P. be 4 5 dismissed with prejudice from this action. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 10 11 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill April 20, 2011 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: b9ed48bb 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Morales v. M & H Realty Partners Affiliated Fund III L.P., et al. Request for Dismissal; Order Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?