Orta v. Taylor et al

Filing 16

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery as Premature 15 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 2/21/13. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOSEPH MATTHEW ORTA, 10 11 CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00506-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AS PREMATURE v. (ECF No. 15) 12 M. E. TAYLOR, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Joseph Matthew Orta is a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in 16 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was filed on March 25, 2011, and 17 a first amended complaint, filed June 20, 2011, is currently pending screening. On January 22, 2013, 18 Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery. 19 As Plaintiff was notified via the first informational order, an order opening discovery is 20 issued once an answer is filed. (First Informational Order ¶ 8, ECF No. 3.) No discovery may be 21 conducted, without permission from the Court, until an answer is filed and the Court issues an order 22 opening discovery. Plaintiff’s motion is premature. Once Defendants have filed an answer a 23 discovery and scheduling order will be issued opening discovery in this action. Accordingly, 24 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed January 22, 2013, is DENIED. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 21, 2013 1 1 i1eed4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?