Davis v. Martel et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/30/2011, CASE TRANSFERRRED to SACRAMENTO Division. New Case Number 2:11-cv-00859-GGH (PC). (Marrujo, C)
(PC) Davis v. Martel et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. M. MARTEL, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by FRANCIS W. DAVIS, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:11-cv-00518-MJS (PC) ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Defendants, all of whom are employed at Mule Creek State Prison. Plaintiff's allegations all stem from acts that occurred at Mule Creek, which is in Amador County. Amador County is in the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should have been filed in the Sacramento Division. Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), the Court may sua sponte transfer a civil action to the appropriate court. Based on the allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint, this action should have been brought in the Sacramento Division and the Court will so order that transfer occur. /// /// -1Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Sacramento; and 2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ci4d6 March 30, 2011 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Michael J. Seng
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?