Espritt v. Saesee et al

Filing 28

ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 23 ; ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief 21 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/26/13. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14

1:11-cv-00519-AWI-GSA-PC

BRIAN ESPRITT,
Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 23.)

vs.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
(Doc. 21.)

A. SAESEE, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16
17

Brian Espritt (APlaintiff@) a civil detainee at Atascadero State Hospital in Atascadero,

18

California, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to

19

42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

20

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On March 7, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

22

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. 23.) Plaintiff was provided

23

an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. On

24

March 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed what amounts to a notice of non-opposition to the findings and

25

recommendations (Doc. 24.)

26
27

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

28
1

1

the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper

2

analysis.

3

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

4

1.

5

The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 7,
2013, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

6

2.

7

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on March 1, 2013, is
DENIED.

8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 26, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13

DEAC_Signature-END:

0m8i788

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2