Fox et al v. County of Tulare, et al

Filing 92

ORDER FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OF PERSONNEL FILES in re the amended motion to compel, document 80 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/19/2013. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 PAMELA FOX, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND AS NEXT FRIEND TO C.M.R., A MINOR, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 Case No. 1:11-cv-00520-AWI-SMS ORDER FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OF PERSONNEL FILES (Doc. 80 – Amended Motion to Compel) vs. 13 14 15 COUNTY OF TULARE, LETICIA CASTANEDA, ERICA SOTO, RON CASTANEDA, JULIA LANGLEY, CAROL HELDING, JOHN ROZUM, STEVEN ROGERS and DOES 1-100, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 In the parties’ Local Rule 251 stipulation, Plaintiff requests an in camera review “of those 20 documents listed in the Privilege Log and any other documents that Defendants refuse to provide 21 without such review.” Doc. 85-2 at 147. Mindful of the claims of privilege and of privacy set forth 22 in the Privilege Log(s), the Court nonetheless at this time orders an in camera review of the 23 personnel files of the remaining individual defendants: Leticia Castaneda, Erica Soto, Ron 24 Castaneda, Julia Langley, Carol Helding, and John Rozum. The Court continues to consider this 25 discovery dispute (see July 15, 2013 minute order, Doc. 88), and may order an in camera review of 26 other files at a later date. 27 Either the attorney for each defendant or the custodial officer for the defendant’s personnel 28 file should schedule a convenient time, on or preferably before August 16, 2013, to deliver the 1 1 personnel file to Judge Snyder’s chambers. Scheduling arrangements should be made through 2 Judge Snyder’s deputy clerk, Ms. Michelle Rooney. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: July 19, 2013 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: icido34h 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?