Ramirez v. County

Filing 31

ORDER VACATING December 10, 2012 heairng, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/3/2012. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 ROSA PATRICIA RAMIREZ, 6 7 8 9 ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) MERCED COUNTY, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) 1:11-CV- 531 AWI DLB ORDER VACATING DECEMBER 10, 2012 HEARING 10 11 Defendants have noticed for hearing and decision a motion for summary judgment. The 12 matter is scheduled for hearing to be held on December 10, 2012. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), 13 Plaintiff was required to file either an opposition or a notice of non-opposition no later than 14 November 26, 2012. Plaintiff failed to do so. Due to Plaintiff’s failure to file a timely 15 opposition or notice of non-opposition, she is in violation of the Local Rules and is not entitled to 16 be heard at oral argument in opposition to the motion. See Local Rule 78-230(c). The Court has 17 reviewed Defendants’ motion and the applicable law, and has determined that the motion is 18 suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 7230(h). 19 20 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of December 21 10, 2012, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of December 10, 2012, the 22 Court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ciem0h December 3, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?