Ramirez v. County

Filing 62

ORDER Adopting 61 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING Defendant's 58 Motion to Amend the Judgment signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/18/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROSA PATRICIA RAMIREZ,
Plaintiff,

12

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AMEND THE
JUDGMENT

v.

13
14

Case No. 1:11 -cv-00531-AWI-SAB

MERCED COUNTY,
(ECF Nos. 58, 61)

15

Defendant.

16
17

On December 11, 2012, an order issued granting Defendant Merced County’s motion for

18 summary judgment and judgment was entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff Rosa
19 Patricia Ramirez (hereafter “Judgment Debtor”).

(ECF Nos. 33, 34.)

On June 22, 2017,

20 Defendant filed a motion to amend the judgment to properly reflect the name of Judgment
21 Debtor who has married and is now using a different name. (ECF No. 58.) The matter was
22 referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule
23 302.
24

On August 18, 2017, the magistrate judge filed a findings and recommendations

25 recommending that Defendant’s motion to amend the judgment be granted. The findings and
26 recommendations was served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the
27 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days (14) days from the date of
28 service. The period for filing objections has passed and no objections have been filed.

1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

2 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the
3 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

FULL;

6
7

2.

3.

12

Plaintiff’s name in the December 23, 2013 supplemental judgment is amended
from Rosa Patricia Ramirez to Rosa Patricia Irwin; and

10
11

Defendant’s motion to amend the supplemental judgment, filed June 22, 2017, is
GRANTED;

8
9

The findings and recommendations, filed August 18, 2017, is ADOPTED IN

4.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to issue an amended supplemental
judgment.

13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15 Dated: September 18, 2017

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2