Shepard v. Cohen et al

Filing 83

ORDER Directing United States Marshal to Initiate Re-Service on Defendant Cohen Using Assistance of Legal Affairs Division of CDCR, as Instructed by this Order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 07/09/2015. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

1:11-cv-00535-LJO-GSA-PC

LAMONT SHEPARD,

12

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14

ORDER DIRECTING UNITED STATES
MARSHAL TO INITIATE RE-SERVICE ON
DEFENDANT COHEN USING
ASSISTANCE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF CDCR, AS INSTRUCTED
BY THIS ORDER

COHEN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

I.

RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Lamont Shepard (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

23

with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983.

24

commencing this action on March 30, 2011. (Doc. 1.) This action now proceeds on the

25

Second Amended Complaint filed on May 19, 2014, against defendants Dr. Cohen, Sergeant J.

26

Lopez, Correctional Officer (C/O) Z. Dean, C/O J. Campbell, and Vera Brown (LVN) on

27

Plaintiff's due process claim, and against defendants Dr. Cohen, Sergeant J. Lopez, C/O Z.

28

Dean, and C/O J. Campbell on Plaintiff's excessive force claim. (Doc. 41.)
1

Plaintiff filed the Complaint

1

On August 22, 2014, the court issued an order directing the United States Marshal

2

(“Marshal”) to serve process upon defendants Brown and Cohen. (Doc. 54.) The address

3

provided by Plaintiff for defendant Cohen was “C.S.P. Corcoran, P.O. Box 8800, Corcoran,

4

California 93212.” (Doc. 78.) In the Court’s order, the Marshal was directed to:

5

10

Personally serve process and a copy of this order upon the
defendant pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c), and shall command all
necessary assistance from the California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to execute this order. The
Marshals Service shall maintain the confidentiality of all
information provided by CDCR pursuant to this order. In
executing this order, the Marshals Service shall contact the Legal
Affairs Division of CDCR and request the assistance of a Special
Investigator if the Litigation Officer at the institution is unable to
assist in identifying and/or locating defendants.

11

(Doc. 54 at 2 ¶4.) On May 26, 2015, the Marshal filed a return of service unexecuted as to

12

defendant Cohen, indicating that the Marshal was unable to locate defendant Cohen for service

13

of process. (Doc. 78.)

6
7
8
9

14

On May 29, 2015, the Court issued an order to show cause, requiring Plaintiff to show

15

cause, within thirty days, why defendant Cohen should not be dismissed from this action for

16

Plaintiff’s failure to provide sufficient information for the Marshal to serve process. (Doc. 80.)

17

On June 12, 2015, Plaintiff filed a response to the Court’s order. (Doc. 82.)

18

Plaintiff asserts that he does not know any address for defendant Dr. Cohen except for

19

Dr. Cohen’s work address, which he provided to the Marshal. However, Plaintiff contends that

20

the CDCR has defendant Cohen’s last known address, due to Cohen’s employment by the

21

CDCR. Plaintiff requests assistance by the Court to obtain such information from the CDCR.

22

II.

DISCUSSION

23

The return of service filed by the Marshal on May 26, 2015, indicates that on September

24

26, 2014, the Marshal mailed service documents to defendant Cohen at Corcoran State Prison

25

(“CSP”), at the address provided by Plaintiff. (Doc. 78.) There is no indication on the return of

26

service that the Marshal received any response to the mail service. (Id.) The Marshal certified

27

that he or she was unable to locate defendant Cohen, and made a notation, “5/26/15 Return

28

Unexecuted, Unable to Locate.” (Id.) There is no indication that the Marshal contacted the
2

1

Legal Affairs Division of CDCR and requested the assistance of a Special Investigator in

2

locating defendant Cohen.

3

Based on the information set forth in the USM-285 form, the Court cannot make a

4

finding that Plaintiff has not provided sufficient information to locate this defendant.

5

Therefore, the Marshal shall be directed to initiate re-service by contacting the Legal Affairs

6

Division of the CDCR for assistance in locating and effecting service on defendant Dr. Cohen.

7

III.

8
9

CONCLUSION
Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c), it is HEREBY

ORDERED that:

10

1.

11

The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward the following documents to the
United States Marshals Service:

12

(1)

One completed and issued summons for defendant Cohen;

13

(2)

One completed USM-285 form for defendant Cohen;

14

(3)

One copy of the Second Amended Complaint filed on May 19,

15

2014, plus an extra copy for the Marshal (Doc. 41.); and

16

(4)

17

2.

18

One copy of this order, plus an extra copy for the Marshal.

Within ten days from the date of this order, the Marshals Service shall contact
the Legal Affairs Division of CDCR and request the assistance of a Special

19

Investigator to assist in identifying and/or locating the defendant. The

20

Marshals Service shall command all necessary assistance from the
21

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to
22

execute this order. The Marshals Service shall maintain the confidentiality of

23

all information provided by the CDCR pursuant to this order. The Marshals

24

Service shall notify the following defendant of the commencement of this action

25
26
27
28

///
///
///
3

1

and request a waiver of service in accordance with the provisions of Fed. R. Civ.

2

P. 4(d) and 28 U.S.C. ' 566(c):

3

DR. COHEN, M.D. (employee of CDCR at Corcoran
State Prison in Corcoran, California, on December 13,
2008)

4
5

3.

The Marshals Service shall file a returned waiver of service as well as any

6

request for waiver of service that is returned as undelivered as soon as it is

7

received.

8

4.

9

If a waiver of service is not returned by the defendant within sixty days of the
date of mailing the request for waiver, the Marshals Service shall:

10

a.

11

Personally serve process and a copy of this order upon the defendant
pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C.

12

' 566(c).

13

b.

Within ten days after personal service is effected, the Marshals Service

14

shall file the return of service for the defendant, along with evidence of
15

any attempts to secure a waiver of service of process and of the costs
16

subsequently incurred in effecting service on said defendant. Said costs

17

shall be enumerated on the USM-285 form and shall include the costs

18

incurred by the Marshals Service for photocopying additional copies of

19

the summons and complaint and for preparing new USM-285 forms, if

20

required. Costs of service will be taxed against the personally served

21

defendant in accordance with the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2).

22

5.

23

If defendant waives service, he is required to return the signed waivers to

24

the Marshals Service. The filing of an answer or a responsive motion does

25

not relieve defendants of this requirement, and the failure to return the

26

signed waivers may subject defendants to an order to pay the costs of

27

service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2).

28

///
4

1

6.

2

In the event that defendants either waive service or are personally served,
defendants are required to reply to the complaint. 42 U.S.C. ' 1997e(g)(2).

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 9, 2015

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5