Shepard v. Cohen et al
Filing
85
ORDER ADOPTING 84 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Summary Judgment and Granting in Part Defendants' 67 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER Entering Summary Judgment in Favor of Defendant V era-Brown on all Claims Against her; ORDER Entering Partial Summary Judgment in Favor of Defendants Dean, Campbell, and Lopez, on Plaintiff's Due Process Claims; ORDER for this Case to Proceed Against Defendant Cohen for Violation of Due Process, and Against Defendants Cohen, Dean, Campbell, and Lopez for Use of Excessive Force signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 09/28/2015. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LAMONT SHEPARD,
8
9
10
11
1:11-cv-00535-LJO-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No. 84.)
vs.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(ECF Nos. 60, 67.)
COHEN, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
ORDER ENTERING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT
VERA-BROWN ON ALL CLAIMS
AGAINST HER
14
15
16
ORDER ENTERING PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS
DEAN, CAMPBELL, AND LOPEZ, ON
PLAINTIFF’S DUE PROCESS CLAIMS
17
18
ORDER FOR THIS CASE TO PROCEED
AGAINST DEFENDANT COHEN FOR
VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, AND
AGAINST DEFENDANTS COHEN, DEAN,
CAMPBELL, AND LOPEZ FOR USE OF
EXCESSIVE FORCE
19
20
21
22
23
Benito Reyes (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights
24
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
25
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
26
On September 2, 2015, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending
27
that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied, and Defendants’ cross-motion for
28
summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. (ECF No. 84.) The parties were
1
1
granted twenty days in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id.) To
2
date, no objections have been filed.
3
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
4
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,
5
the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper
6
analysis.
7
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
8
1.
9
10
September 2, 2015, are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2.
11
12
3.
4.
Order entering summary judgment in favor of defendant Vera-Brown on all of
Plaintiff’s claims against her;
5.
Order entering partial summary judgment in favor of defendants Dean,
Campbell, and Lopez, on Plaintiff’s due process claims;
17
18
Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment, filed on December 8, 2014, is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;
15
16
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed on October 14, 2014, is
DENIED;
13
14
The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on
6.
Order for this case to proceed against defendant Cohen for violation of due
19
process, and against defendants Cohen, Dean, Campbell, and Lopez for use of
20
excessive force; and
21
7.
Order referring this case back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
September 28, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?