Taylor v. Ohannesson et al

Filing 47

ORDER Granting Defendants' 46 Request to Conduct Plaintiff's Deposition Via Videoconference signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/14/2014. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRACY TAYLOR, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. SHAYE O’HANNESON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:11-cv-00538-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO CONDUCT PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE [ECF No. 46] Plaintiff Tracy Taylor is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 14, 2014, Defendants filed a request to conduct Plaintiff’s deposition via 19 20 videoconference pursuant to Rule 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants 21 indicate that Plaintiff is presently incarcerated at California State Prison, Los Angeles County (aka 22 Antelope Valley), located at 44750-60th Street, Lancaster, California, approximately 5 hours and 35 23 minutes away from the Attorney General’s Office in Sacramento, California. Defendants intend to 24 take the deposition at the prison on June 25, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., and Defendants have reserved 25 videoconferencing facilities. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Good cause having been presented to the Court, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ request to take Plaintiff’s deposition via 3 videoconference is GRANTED. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 14, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?