Brisbin v. Vulcan Materials Company

Filing 19

ORDER GRANTING 18 the parties' stipulated request to modify the scheduling order. Discovery due by 3/16/2012. Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 3/21/2012. Dispositive Motions filed by 4/27/2012. Settlement Conference set for 5/17/2 012, at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Pretrial Conference set for 7/25/2012, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Trial set for 9/18/2012, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/4/2012. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN C. BRISBIN, an individual, dba CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS, 8 Plaintiff, 9 CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00568-AWI-SKO ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER v. 10 11 12 CALMAT CO, dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY - WESTERN DIVISION; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 13 (Docket No. 18) Defendant. 14 15 16 CALMAT CO., dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY – WESTERN DIVISION, 17 18 19 20 Counter-Claimant v. JOHN C. BRISBIN, an individual, dba CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS; WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, a South Dakota corporation, 21 22 23 Counter-Defendants. ___________________________________/ 24 On December 29, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation seeking a modification of the 25 scheduling order. (Doc. 18.) Specifically, the parties have scheduled a private mediation that will 26 take place on January 27, 2012, and the parties wish to "avoid taking all of the necessary depositions 27 and completion of other discovery in the case prior to the . . . mediation, in order to save attorney's 28 1 fees and costs." (Doc. 18, 2:20-24.) As such, the parties request that the deadlines be extended 60 2 days to accommodate the scheduled mediation. 3 Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline 4 1. Non-Expert Disc. October 31, 2011 March 30, 2012 5 2. Expert Discovery January 31, 2012 March 30, 2012 6 3. Non-dispositive filing January 23, 2012 March 23, 2012 7 4. Dispositive motion filing February 29, 2012 April 27, 2012 8 5. Settlement Conference March 6, 2012 May 4, 2012 9 6. Pre-Trial Conference May 23, 2012 July 23, 2012 10 7. Trial July 17, 2012 September 17, 2012 11 12 The parties propose that no other deadlines be modified, e.g., the expert disclosure deadline and the supplemental expert disclosure deadline. 13 Allowing additional time for the parties to attempt to resolve their dispute through mediation 14 conserves resources and represents good cause for a modification of the scheduling deadlines. While 15 the deadlines proposed by the parties are generally acceptable, the Court will modify the proposed 16 dates of the Pre-Trial Conference and the Trial date to comport with the Chief District Judge Ishii's 17 calendar, and the proposed date for the settlement conference will be modified to comport with 18 Magistrate Judge Oberto's calendar. Further, the proposed deadline for the close of discovery will 19 be set prior to the deadline for filing non-dispositive motions. 20 Accordingly, the schedule is modified as follows: 21 Event Current Deadline New Deadline 22 1. Non-Expert Disc. October 31, 2011 March 16, 2012 23 2. Expert Discovery January 31, 2012 March 16, 2012 24 3. Non-dispositive filing January 23, 2012 March 21, 2012 25 4. Non-dispos. mtn hearing 26 5. Dispositive motion filing 27 6. Disp. Motion hearing 28 5. Settlement Conference On or before April 18, 2012 February 29, 2012 April 27, 2012 On or before June 11, 2012 March 6, 2012 2 May 17, 2012 1 6. Pre-Trial Conference May 23, 2012 July 25, 2012 2 7. Trial July 17, 2012 September 18, 2012 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: ie14hj January 4, 2012 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?