Brisbin v. Vulcan Materials Company
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING 18 the parties' stipulated request to modify the scheduling order. Discovery due by 3/16/2012. Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 3/21/2012. Dispositive Motions filed by 4/27/2012. Settlement Conference set for 5/17/2 012, at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Pretrial Conference set for 7/25/2012, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Trial set for 9/18/2012, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/4/2012. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOHN C. BRISBIN, an individual, dba
CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT
SYSTEMS,
8
Plaintiff,
9
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00568-AWI-SKO
ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES'
STIPULATED REQUEST TO
MODIFY THE SCHEDULING
ORDER
v.
10
11
12
CALMAT CO, dba VULCAN
MATERIALS COMPANY - WESTERN
DIVISION; and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
13
(Docket No. 18)
Defendant.
14
15
16
CALMAT CO., dba VULCAN
MATERIALS COMPANY – WESTERN
DIVISION,
17
18
19
20
Counter-Claimant
v.
JOHN C. BRISBIN, an individual, dba
CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT
SYSTEMS; WESTERN SURETY
COMPANY, a South Dakota corporation,
21
22
23
Counter-Defendants.
___________________________________/
24
On December 29, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation seeking a modification of the
25
scheduling order. (Doc. 18.) Specifically, the parties have scheduled a private mediation that will
26
take place on January 27, 2012, and the parties wish to "avoid taking all of the necessary depositions
27
and completion of other discovery in the case prior to the . . . mediation, in order to save attorney's
28
1
fees and costs." (Doc. 18, 2:20-24.) As such, the parties request that the deadlines be extended 60
2
days to accommodate the scheduled mediation.
3
Event
Current Deadline
Proposed Deadline
4
1.
Non-Expert Disc.
October 31, 2011
March 30, 2012
5
2.
Expert Discovery
January 31, 2012
March 30, 2012
6
3.
Non-dispositive filing
January 23, 2012
March 23, 2012
7
4.
Dispositive motion filing
February 29, 2012
April 27, 2012
8
5.
Settlement Conference
March 6, 2012
May 4, 2012
9
6.
Pre-Trial Conference
May 23, 2012
July 23, 2012
10
7.
Trial
July 17, 2012
September 17, 2012
11
12
The parties propose that no other deadlines be modified, e.g., the expert disclosure deadline
and the supplemental expert disclosure deadline.
13
Allowing additional time for the parties to attempt to resolve their dispute through mediation
14
conserves resources and represents good cause for a modification of the scheduling deadlines. While
15
the deadlines proposed by the parties are generally acceptable, the Court will modify the proposed
16
dates of the Pre-Trial Conference and the Trial date to comport with the Chief District Judge Ishii's
17
calendar, and the proposed date for the settlement conference will be modified to comport with
18
Magistrate Judge Oberto's calendar. Further, the proposed deadline for the close of discovery will
19
be set prior to the deadline for filing non-dispositive motions.
20
Accordingly, the schedule is modified as follows:
21
Event
Current Deadline
New Deadline
22
1.
Non-Expert Disc.
October 31, 2011
March 16, 2012
23
2.
Expert Discovery
January 31, 2012
March 16, 2012
24
3.
Non-dispositive filing
January 23, 2012
March 21, 2012
25
4.
Non-dispos. mtn hearing
26
5.
Dispositive motion filing
27
6.
Disp. Motion hearing
28
5.
Settlement Conference
On or before April 18, 2012
February 29, 2012
April 27, 2012
On or before June 11, 2012
March 6, 2012
2
May 17, 2012
1
6.
Pre-Trial Conference
May 23, 2012
July 25, 2012
2
7.
Trial
July 17, 2012
September 18, 2012
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
ie14hj
January 4, 2012
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?