Escamilla v. Target Corporation

Filing 14

Stipulation for Dismissal and ORDER, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/29/12. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

1

4

CANELO, WILSON, WALLACE & PADRON
KENNETH R. MACKIE, Cal. Bar No. 248473
[e-mail]
Post Office Box 2165
Merced, California 95344-0165
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff, SYLVIA ESCAMILLA

6

10

JACKSON LEWIS LLP
JAMES T. JONES, Cal. Bar No. 167967
[e-mail]
RANDALL J. HAKES, Cal. Bar No. 233548
[e-mail]
801 “K” Street, Suite 2300
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11

Attorneys for Defendant, TARGET CORPORATION

2
3

7
8
9

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

FRESNO DIVISION

16
17

SYLVIA ESCAMILLA,

18

Case No: 1:11-CV-00570-LJO-MJS
Plaintiff,

19

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
ORDER

vs.

20

TARGET CORPORATION,
and DOE 1 through DOE 100, inclusive,

21

Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:

August 25, 2010
August 20, 2012

Defendants.

22
23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

CANELO, WILSON,
WALLACE & PADRON
548 W. 21st Street
P.O. Box 2165
Merced, CA 95344
[phone]

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Escamilla v. Target Corporation
USDC - EDC Case No. 1:11-CV-00570-LJO-MJS

1

1

TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

2

CALIFORNIA:

3

Plaintiff SYLVIA ESCAMILLA and defendant TARGET CORPORATION, by and

4

through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this action in its

5

entirety, with prejudice, and without an award of attorneys' fees or costs to any party.

6
7

Dated: March

, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

8

CANELO, WILSON, WALLACE & PADRON

9

By:

10

Kenneth R. Mackie

11

Attorneys for Plaintiff,
SYLVIA ESCAMILLA

12
13

Dated: March

, 2012

14

JACKSON LEWIS LLP
By:
James T. Jones
Randall J. Hakes

15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION

17
18

ORDER

19
20

Based on the foregoing stipulation,

21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, and

22

without an award of attorney's fees or costs to any party. The clerk is directed to close this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated:
66h44d

March 29, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
CANELO, WILSON,
WALLACE & PADRON
548 W. 21st Street
P.O. Box 2165
Merced, CA 95344
[phone]

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Escamilla v. Target Corporation
USDC - EDC Case No. 1:11-CV-00570-LJO-MJS

2