Gutierrez v. Ohanian et al

Filing 38

ORDER Amending 30 Conset Decree and Directing the Clerk of Court to Administratively Close Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/30/12. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

NATIVIDAD GUTIERREZ,

12

1:11-cv-00579-SMS
ORDER AMENDING CONSENT DECREE
AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY
CLOSE CASE
(Doc. 30)

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14

JOHN OHANIAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.
/

16
17

The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close

18

this case, despite the specific term set forth in the Consent

19

Decree, signed on February 14, 2012, Doc. 30, page 4, No. 10,

20

wherein, in part, it states:

21
22
23

“The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this
action to enforce provisions of this Order
for twelve (12) months after the date of this
Consent Decree, or until the injunctive
relief contemplated by this Order is
completed, whichever occurs later.”

24
25

The issue of the Court declining to retain jurisdiction in

26

any of Ms. Moore’s cases arose specifically in Daniel Delgado v.

27

Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation and Stephen Investments, Inc.,

28

USDC Case No. 1:11-cv-02024-SMS, on or about April 18, 2012,
1

1

after the Consent Decree was signed in the above-captioned case.

2

The court shall not retain jurisdiction, and directs the Clerk of

3

Court to administratively close this case.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated:
icido3

May 30, 2012

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2