Gutierrez v. Singh et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ACTION; ORDER, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/20/2011. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4

K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Natividad Gutierrez

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

NATIVIDAD GUTIERREZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.
PALWINDER SINGH, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

) No. 1:11-CV-00583-LJO-BAM
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Natividad Gutierrez

19

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Palwinder Singh, Jagir Singh and Ravinder Kaur dba Family

20

Express Food & Liquor (Defendants”), the parties to this action, by and through their respective

21

counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned

22

action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

23

Date: December 20, 2011

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

24
25
/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Natividad Gutierrez

26
27
28

///

Gutierrez v. Singh, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal

Page 1

1

Date: December 20, 2011

FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

2
3

/s/ James Fessenden
James Fessenden, Attorneys for
Defendants Palwinder Singh, Jagir Singh
and Ravinder Kaur dba Family Express
Food & Liquor

4
5
6
7
8

ORDER

9
10
The parties having so stipulated,

11
12

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The
clerk is directed to close this action.

13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

December 20, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

66h44d

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Gutierrez v. Singh, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal

Page 2