Rodgers v. Lopez et al

Filing 7

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:11-cv-0821 JFM P) to Fresno (1:11-cv-0630 MJS P signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/19/2011. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SYNRICO RODGERS, 11 Plaintiff, No. 2:11-cv-0821 JFM (PC) vs. 12 13 R. LOPEZ, Warden, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant 16 17 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his complaint, 18 plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations took place in 19 Kings County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the 20 Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d). Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in 21 22 the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper 23 division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the 24 court. In light of 1996 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this court will not rule on plaintiff’s 25 request to proceed in forma pauperis or motion to appoint counsel. 26 ///// 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This court has not ruled on plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis or 3 motion to appoint counsel; 4 5 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 6 7 3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: 8 United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 9 10 11 DATED: April 19, 2011. 12 13 14 15 /mp014;rodg0821.22 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?