Black & Veatch Corporation v. Modesto Irrigation District
Filing
211
STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding Pending Discovery Motions. The due date for Black & Veatch's reply brief for its motion to compel the production of documents by City of Modesto 162 , regarding the production of arbitration-related co mmunications, is CONTINUED to October 12, 2012; The informal telephonic discovery conference concerning Black & Veatch's motion to compel the production of documents by Modesto Irrigation District 125 , regarding the issue of the time frame for Modesto Irrigation District to produce the 2008 to present emails, is CONTINUED to October 17, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.; The briefing schedule for Black & Veatch's motion to compel production of documents from Modesto Irrigation District (Doc. 1 25), as to the issue of sharing the costs of restoring Modesto Irrigation District's pre-2008 emails, is CONTINUED as follows: Black & Veatch's opening brief is due on October 12, 2012; and Modesto Irrigation Districts opposition brief i s due on October 24, 2012; The hearing for both Black & Veatch's motion to compel production of documents from City of Modesto of arbitration-related communications 162 , and Black & Veatch's motion to compel of documents from Modesto Irrigation District related to the issue of cost-sharing 125 , shall be held on October 31, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7, before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/9/2012. (Timken, A)
8 LANG, RICHERT & PATCH
Mark L. Creede, SBN 128418
9 Matthew W. Quall, SBN 183759
Fig Garden Financial Center
10
5200 North Palm Avenue, Fourth Floor
11 Fresno, CA 93704
Telephone: (559) 228-6700
12 Facsimile: (559) 228-6728
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
KAISER CENTER
300 LAKESIDE DRIVE, 24TH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612-3524
Tel (510) 835-9100 • Fax (510) 451-2170
LAW OFFICES
WULFSBERG REESE COLVIG & FIRSTMAN
1 WULFSBERG REESE COLVIG & FIRSTMAN
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2 H. James Wulfsberg, SBN 046192
3 Gregory R. Aker, SBN 104171
Stephen L. Cali, SBN 133923
4 David J. Hyndman, SBN 193944
Kaiser Center
5 300 Lakeside Drive, 24th Floor
Oakland, California 94612-3524
6 Telephone: (510) 835-9100
7 Facsimile: (510) 451-2170
13 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
17
18
BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION,
19
Plaintiff,
20
vs.
21
22
23
Case No. 1:11-cv-00695 LJO SKO
STIPULATION AND
ORDER REGARDING PENDING
DISCOVERY MOTIONS
_______________________________________
MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT,
Defendant.
Courtroom: 7
Judge:
Hon. Sheila K. Oberto
Trial Date:
24
AND RELATED ACTIONS.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
1645-038\2374805.1
July 16, 2013
1
STIPULATION
2
Plaintiff and counter-defendant Black & Veatch Corporation (Black & Veatch), defendant
3 and counter-claimant, Modesto Irrigation District (MID), and intervenor, City of Modesto (City),
4 have reached a tentative agreement for settlement of the parties’ respective claims in this
5 litigation. MID and the City each plan to present the tentative settlement to MID’s Board and to
6 the City Council for their consideration and approval at their meetings scheduled for October 9,
7 2012. To avoid the unnecessary expenditure of legal fees in the interim, Black & Veatch, MID
8 and the City wish to briefly postpone certain deadlines with respect to the discovery motions
9 pending before the Court that are listed below.
Accordingly, Black & Veatch, MID and the City hereby stipulate as follows:
11
1. With respect to Black & Veatch’s motion to compel production by the City of
12 arbitration-related communications that the City claims are protected by the joint defense
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
KAISER CENTER
300 LAKESIDE DRIVE, 24TH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612-3524
Tel (510) 835-9100 • Fax (510) 451-2170
LAW OFFICES
WULFSBERG REESE COLVIG & FIRSTMAN
10
13 privilege, which is scheduled for hearing before the Court on October 17, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.,
14 Black & Veatch and MID agree to extend the due date for Black & Veatch’s reply brief from
15 October 5 to October 12, 2012.
2. With respect to Black & Veatch’s motion to compel production of MID’s 2008-present
16
17 emails, Black & Veatch and MID agree to postpone their meet-and-confer, presently scheduled for
18 October 5, at 2:30 p.m., to a mutually-agreeable time on October 10 or 11, 2012. Further, the
19 parties agree, subject to the Court’s approval, to continue the telephone hearing presently
20 scheduled for October 10, at 4:30 p.m., to the week of October 15, 2012, on a day and time
21 convenient to the Court.
3. With respect to Black & Veatch’s motion to require MID to share in the cost of
22
23 restoring MID’s pre-2008 GroupWise emails, which is scheduled for hearing before the Court on
24 October 31, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., Black & Veatch and MID agree to extend the due date for Black &
25 Veatch’s opening brief from October 5 to October 12, 2012, and the due date for MID’s
26 opposition brief from October 19 to October 26, 2012.
27 //
28 //
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER
1645-038\2374805.1
1
DATED: October 5, 2012
WULFSBERG REESE COLVIG & FIRSTMAN
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2
3
By
4
/s/ Gregory R. Aker
Gregory R. Aker
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION
6
7 DATED: October 5, 2012
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH, LLP
8
9
By /s/ Stephen E. Carroll (as authorized on 10/5/12)
Stephen E. Carroll
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
11
12
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
KAISER CENTER
300 LAKESIDE DRIVE, 24TH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612-3524
Tel (510) 835-9100 • Fax (510) 451-2170
LAW OFFICES
WULFSBERG REESE COLVIG & FIRSTMAN
10
13 DATED: October 5, 2012
DAVIDOVITZ & BENNETT, LLP
14
15
16
By /s/ Patricia S. Lakner (as authorized on 10/5/12)
Patricia S. Lakner
17
Attorneys for Intervenor CITY OF MODESTO
18
19
ORDER
20
21
Pursuant to the above stipulation of the parties and the Court’s schedule, IT IS HEREBY
22 ORDERED that:
23
1. The due date for Black & Veatch’s reply brief for its motion to compel the production of
24
documents by City of Modesto (Doc. 162), regarding the production of arbitration-related
25
communications, is CONTINUED to October 12, 2012;
26
2. The informal telephonic discovery conference concerning Black & Veatch’s motion to
27
compel the production of documents by Modesto Irrigation District (Doc. 125), regarding
28
the issue of the time frame for Modesto Irrigation District to produce the 2008 to present
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER
1645-038\2374805.1
1
emails, is CONTINUED to October 17, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.;
3. The briefing schedule for Black & Veatch’s motion to compel production of documents
2
Modesto Irrigation District’s pre-2008 emails, is CONTINUED as follows:
5
a. Black & Veatch’s opening brief is due on October 12, 2012; and
6
b. Modesto Irrigation District’s opposition brief is due on October 24, 2012; 1
7
4. The hearing for both Black & Veatch’s motion to compel production of documents from
8
City of Modesto of arbitration-related communications (Doc. 162), and Black & Veatch’s
9
motion to compel of documents from Modesto Irrigation District related to the issue of
10
cost-sharing (Doc. 125), shall be held on October 31, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7,
11
before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto.
12
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
KAISER CENTER
300 LAKESIDE DRIVE, 24TH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612-3524
Tel (510) 835-9100 • Fax (510) 451-2170
LAW OFFICES
from Modesto Irrigation District (Doc. 125), as to the issue of sharing the costs of restoring
4
WULFSBERG REESE COLVIG & FIRSTMAN
3
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
16
October 9, 2012
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
DEAC_Signature-END:
ie14hje
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Although the parties requested that Modesto Irrigation District’s opposition brief be due on October 26,
2012, to allow the Court sufficient time to consider the opposition prior to the October 31, 2012, hearing, the
opposition will be due on October 24, 2012.
-3STIPULATION AND ORDER
1645-038\2374805.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?