Butler v. Onyejie et al

Filing 52

ORDER ; Granting Defendant's 51 Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/15/2013. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PERRY C. BUTLER, Case No. 1:11-cv-00723-MJS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 15 ONYEJE, 16 Defendant. 17 The Court has considered Defendant Onyeje’s first request for a 7-day extension of time to 18 19 prepare and file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment 20 and an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to strike the declaration of Dr. Barnett. GOOD CAUSE appearing for the request, Defendant shall have until May 22, 2013, to 21 22 prepare and file his reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment 23 and opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to strike. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: 27 May 15, 2013 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 DEAC_Signature-END: 1 [Proposed] Order (1:11-cv-00723-MJS) 1 ci4d6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order (1:11-cv-00723-MJS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?