Polk v. Pittman et al

Filing 70

ORDER Disregarding Plaintiff's Letter to Court 68 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/13/13. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SUSAN MAE POLK,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

PITTMAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:11-cv-00728-AWI-BAM PC
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S LETTER
TO COURT
(ECF No. 68)

17
18

Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

19

pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 6, 2011. On October 22,

20

2012, the Court issued an order regarding Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. The order dismissed

21

certain claims and defendants and directed Plaintiff either to file an amended complaint or notify the

22

Court that she is willing to proceed only against Defendants Keith, Logan, Gerber, and Mason for

23

failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 47.)

24

On April 12, 2013, Plaintiff sent the Court a copy of a letter she wrote to Center for Disease

25

Control and Prevention regarding rodent infestation in the Administrative Segregation Units at

26

California Institute for Women, Central California Women’s Facility and Valley State Prison. (ECF

27

No. 68.)

28
1

1

Plaintiff’s letter is informational and does not request any relief from this Court that Plaintiff

2

might arguably be entitled to in this action. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s letter filed on April 12, 2013, is

3

HEREBY DISREGARDED.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

May 13, 2013

7

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

8

A. McAuliffe

10c20kb8554

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2