Cranford v. Badagon
Filing
104
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 103 Motion for Jury Trial Date and for Discovery Ruling signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/20/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
ARCHIE CRANFORD,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
v.
ANGELA BADAGON, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
CONSOLIDATED ACTION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:11-cv-00736-LJO-BAM
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR JURY TRIAL DATE AND FOR
DISCOVERY RULING
(ECF No. 103)
17
18
Plaintiff Archie Cranford (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma
19
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against
20
Defendant Balcagon (erroneously sued as Badagon) for excessive force in violation of the
21
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This matter is currently set for a
22
telephonic trial confirmation hearing on October 21, 2015, at 8:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4(LJO).
23
On October 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed the instant motion, requesting that the Court set a
24
trial date, and rule on his allegedly pending second motion to compel concerning his discovery
25
request for paper copies of photos. (ECF No. 103.) The trial date will be discussed at the
26
upcoming telephonic trial confirmation hearing, and thus Plaintiff’s motion to set a date is
27
premature. Regarding Plaintiff’s request for a ruling, contrary to his contentions, there is no
28
motion to compel pending before this Court at this time, and nothing for the Court to rule on.
1
1
2
For these reasons, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to set a trial date and
for a discovery ruling is DENIED.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
October 20, 2015
6
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?