Cranford v. Badagon
Filing
74
ORDER Striking Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 71 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/24/14. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ANGELA BADAGON,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________________ )
)
CONSOLIDATED ACTION
)
)
ARCHIE CRANFORD,
Case No.: 1:11-cv-00736-LJO-BAM
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
(ECF No. 71)
Plaintiff Archie Cranford (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee pro se and in forma pauperis in this
19
20
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Balcagon for
21
excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and against Defendants Perryman and
22
Harder for failure to protect in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.1 Defendant Balcagon filed an
23
answer on July 24, 2012. Defendants Perryman and Harder answered the complaint on October 16,
24
2013, before this action was consolidated. Defendants Perryman and Harder also filed a motion for
25
summary judgment on April 23, 2014. (ECF No. 59.)
26
27
1
28
Defendant Balcagon was sued erroneously as “Angela Badagon.” Defendant Harder was sued erroneously as “Charlotte
Havder.”
1
1
Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend its pleading once
2
as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. Otherwise, a party may
3
amend only by leave of the court or by written consent of the adverse party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). As
4
noted above, Defendants have filed answers in this action. Plaintiff has not requested leave to amend,
5
and the Court has not granted such leave. Therefore, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the first amended
6
complaint, lodged June 11, 2014, is STRICKEN from the record.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
June 24, 2014
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?