Breceda v. Hartley

Filing 4

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:11-cv-1141 DAD HC) to Fresno (1:11-cv-0752 SMS HC) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/10/2011; this court has not ruled on ptnr's request to proceed ifp. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON BRECEDA, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. CIV S-11-1141 DAD P vs. JAMES D. HARTLEY, 14 Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma 18 pauperis. In his application, petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered by the Tulare 19 County Superior Court. Tulare County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District 20 Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d). 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in 22 the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper 23 division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the 24 court. This court will not rule on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis; 3 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern 4 District of California sitting in Fresno; and 5 6 3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: 7 United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 8 9 10 DATED: May 10, 2011. 11 12 13 14 15 DAD:kly brec1141.109 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?