United Pacific Energy Operations And Consulting, Inc. et al v. Gas And Oil Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 21

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME for a Notice and Hearing of Motion to Invalidate Third-Party Claim. IN-COURT HEARING on plaintiff's motion is set for 6/9/2011 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Eastern District's US Marshal Service, and its agents and employees, are enjoined from transferring, releasing, or making any other disposition of any properties levied upon by them on behalf of plaintiff, or rel easing any lien or other security interest of plaintiff, including the properties known as BLM Lease Nos. CACA 45618 and 45619, in Kern County, California; order signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/23/2011. (US Marshal Service, Fresno, hand delivered copy of instant order)(Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 UNITED PACIFIC ENERGY OPERATIONS ) AND CONSULTING, INC., etc., et ) al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) GAS AND OIL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) etc., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) 1:11-cv-0756 OWW SMS TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR NOTICE AND HEARING OF MOTION TO INVALIDATE THIRD PARTY CLAIM [CCP § 720.380] 16 17 18 The Ex Parte Application (“Application”) of Judgment 19 Creditor United Pacific Energy Operations and Consulting, Inc. 20 (“Plaintiff”), for Temporary Retraining Order staying disposition 21 of properties levied upon by the U.S. Marshals Services, and for 22 Order Shortening Time for the notice and hearing of a Petition to 23 Invalidate Third Party Claim of Tearlach Resources (California) 24 Ltd. (“TRC”), and supporting documentary and other evidence 25 having been duly filed, and having been considered by the Court 26 at the Court’s ex parte hearing hereof on May 23, 2011, and good 27 cause appearing therefor; 28 IT IS ORDERED: 1 1 1. Pending hearing of Plaintiff’s Petition to Invalidate 2 Third Party Claim of Tearlach Resources (California) Ltd. 3 (“Petition”), set for hearing as indicated below, or at such 4 other subsequent date as the matter may be continued to by the 5 Court, the Eastern District U.S. Marshals Services (“USMS”) and 6 its agents and employees, are hereby enjoined from transferring, 7 releasing or making any other disposition of any properties 8 levied upon by the USMS on behalf of Plaintiff UPEOC, or 9 releasing any lien or other security interest of the Plaintiff 10 UPEOC in any properties levied upon by the USMS on behalf of 11 Plaintiff UPEOC, including the properties known as BLM Lease Nos. 12 CACA 45618 and 45619, in Kern County, California. 13 2. Plaintiff shall personally serve or serve by overnight 14 delivery this Notice of Hearing of the Petition (which the 15 Plaintiff has previously served on respondent TRC and filed 16 herein) on respondent by May 23, 2011, before 11:59 p.m. 17 may be by fax to be followed by mailing within one day. 18 court clerk shall place the Plaintiff’s motion on calendar for 19 hearing at 12:00 p.m. on June 9, 2011, in Courtroom 3, of the 20 above-captioned court. 21 3. Service The Pursuant to FRCP Rule 65(b)(2) the Court also finds as 22 follows: (a) that issuance of this Order is appropriate as the 23 Plaintiff’s injury is the imminent loss of a valuable security 24 interest in two oil properties and (b) such injury is irreparable 25 because the said security interest would be unavailable to secure 26 Plaintiff’s execution against the said properties. 27 28 PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 231, RESPONDENTS HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPLY TO THE COURT FOR MODIFICATION OR DISSOLUTION ON TWO (2) 2 1 DAYS’ NOTICE OR SUCH SHORTER NOTICE AS THE COURT MAY ALLOW. 2 FED. R. CIV. P. 65(B). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: May 23, 2011 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 SEE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?