United Pacific Energy Operations And Consulting, Inc. et al v. Gas And Oil Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
21
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME for a Notice and Hearing of Motion to Invalidate Third-Party Claim. IN-COURT HEARING on plaintiff's motion is set for 6/9/2011 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Eastern District's US Marshal Service, and its agents and employees, are enjoined from transferring, releasing, or making any other disposition of any properties levied upon by them on behalf of plaintiff, or rel easing any lien or other security interest of plaintiff, including the properties known as BLM Lease Nos. CACA 45618 and 45619, in Kern County, California; order signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/23/2011. (US Marshal Service, Fresno, hand delivered copy of instant order)(Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
UNITED PACIFIC ENERGY OPERATIONS )
AND CONSULTING, INC., etc., et
)
al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
GAS AND OIL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., )
etc., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
1:11-cv-0756 OWW SMS
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME
FOR NOTICE AND HEARING OF
MOTION TO INVALIDATE THIRD
PARTY CLAIM
[CCP § 720.380]
16
17
18
The Ex Parte Application (“Application”) of Judgment
19
Creditor United Pacific Energy Operations and Consulting, Inc.
20
(“Plaintiff”), for Temporary Retraining Order staying disposition
21
of properties levied upon by the U.S. Marshals Services, and for
22
Order Shortening Time for the notice and hearing of a Petition to
23
Invalidate Third Party Claim of Tearlach Resources (California)
24
Ltd. (“TRC”), and supporting documentary and other evidence
25
having been duly filed, and having been considered by the Court
26
at the Court’s ex parte hearing hereof on May 23, 2011, and good
27
cause appearing therefor;
28
IT IS ORDERED:
1
1
1.
Pending hearing of Plaintiff’s Petition to Invalidate
2
Third Party Claim of Tearlach Resources (California) Ltd.
3
(“Petition”), set for hearing as indicated below, or at such
4
other subsequent date as the matter may be continued to by the
5
Court, the Eastern District U.S. Marshals Services (“USMS”) and
6
its agents and employees, are hereby enjoined from transferring,
7
releasing or making any other disposition of any properties
8
levied upon by the USMS on behalf of Plaintiff UPEOC, or
9
releasing any lien or other security interest of the Plaintiff
10
UPEOC in any properties levied upon by the USMS on behalf of
11
Plaintiff UPEOC, including the properties known as BLM Lease Nos.
12
CACA 45618 and 45619, in Kern County, California.
13
2.
Plaintiff shall personally serve or serve by overnight
14
delivery this Notice of Hearing of the Petition (which the
15
Plaintiff has previously served on respondent TRC and filed
16
herein) on respondent by May 23, 2011, before 11:59 p.m.
17
may be by fax to be followed by mailing within one day.
18
court clerk shall place the Plaintiff’s motion on calendar for
19
hearing at 12:00 p.m. on June 9, 2011, in Courtroom 3, of the
20
above-captioned court.
21
3.
Service
The
Pursuant to FRCP Rule 65(b)(2) the Court also finds as
22
follows: (a) that issuance of this Order is appropriate as the
23
Plaintiff’s injury is the imminent loss of a valuable security
24
interest in two oil properties and (b) such injury is irreparable
25
because the said security interest would be unavailable to secure
26
Plaintiff’s execution against the said properties.
27
28
PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 231, RESPONDENTS HAVE THE RIGHT TO
APPLY TO THE COURT FOR MODIFICATION OR DISSOLUTION ON TWO (2)
2
1
DAYS’ NOTICE OR SUCH SHORTER NOTICE AS THE COURT MAY ALLOW.
2
FED. R. CIV. P. 65(B).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
May 23, 2011
emm0d6
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
SEE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?