Jenkins v. Yates et al

Filing 21

ORDER Adopting 19 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Denying 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/20/12. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMAL ALBERT JENKINS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. JAMES A. YATES, et al., 15 16 1:11-cv-00805-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 19.) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Doc. 14.) Defendants. _____________________________/ 17 Jamal Albert Jenkins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 13, 2012, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that Plaintiff's 21 motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on October 4, 2011, be denied. Plaintiff was provided 22 an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. To date, 23 Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 27 /// 28 1 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. 3 The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on July 13, 2012, are adopted in full; and 4 2. 5 Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on October 4, 2011, is DENIED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: b9ed48 August 20, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?