Jenkins v. Yates et al
Filing
21
ORDER Adopting 19 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Denying 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/20/12. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMAL ALBERT JENKINS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
JAMES A. YATES, et al.,
15
16
1:11-cv-00805-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 19.)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Doc. 14.)
Defendants.
_____________________________/
17
Jamal Albert Jenkins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 13, 2012, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that Plaintiff's
21
motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on October 4, 2011, be denied. Plaintiff was provided
22
an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. To date,
23
Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
27
///
28
1
1
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
2
1.
3
The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on July 13, 2012,
are adopted in full; and
4
2.
5
Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on October 4, 2011, is
DENIED.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
b9ed48
August 20, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?