Omara v. Smith et al
Filing
29
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to DISMISS: DEFENDANTS Matthew Cate and J. Clark Kelso pursuant to Plaintiff's NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/03/2011. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MICHAEL A. OMARA,
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00812-LJO-DLB PC
11
Plaintiff,
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS
MATTHEW CATE AND J. CLARK KELSO
PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
12
v.
13
STEVEN SMITH, et al.,
14
Defendants.
(DOC. 14)
15
16
/
17
18
Plaintiff Michael A. Omara (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
19
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this
20
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action was removed from Tuolumne
21
County Superior Court by Defendant J. Clark Kelso on May 18, 2011. Defendants Matthew
22
Cate, Steven Smith, and Jack. St. Clair joined Defendant Kelso’s removal.
23
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal of Defendants J.
24
Clark Kelso and Matthew Cate, filed June 8, 2011. Doc. 14. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of
25
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without court order by
26
filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary
27
judgment. See Ethridge v. Harbor House Restaurant, 861 F.2d 1389, 1392 (9th Cir. 1988)
28
(noting partial dismissal of all claims against one or more defendants appropriate under Rule 41).
1
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is to dismiss
2
Defendants J. Clark Kelso and Matthew Cate from this action pursuant to Plaintiff’s notice of
3
voluntary dismissal.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
77e0d6
October 3, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?