Calihan v. Giurbino et al

Filing 5

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:11-cv-1169 DAD) to Fresno (1:11-cv-0868 SKO) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/26/11. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNY CALIHAN, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. G. GIURBINO, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. CIV S-11-1169 DAD P ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant 17 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his complaint, 18 plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by the named defendants during a time that plaintiff 19 was incarcerated at California State Prison - Corcoran. The alleged violations took place in 20 Kings County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the 21 Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d). 22 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in 23 the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper 24 division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the 25 court. In light of 1996 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this court will not rule on plaintiff’s 26 request to proceed in forma pauperis. 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This court has not ruled on plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis; 3 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern 4 District of California sitting in Fresno; and 5 6 3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: 7 United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 8 9 10 DATED: May 26, 2011. 11 12 13 14 DAD:9 cali1169.22 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?