Carr v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a continuance of the Scheduling Conference currently set for 8/2/2011 and CONTINUING it 8/23/2011 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin; order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/28/2011. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JUNE D. COLEMAN, State Bar No. 191890 jcoleman@kmtg.com CANDICE L. FIELDS, State Bar No. 172174 cfields@kmtg.com KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD A Law Corporation 400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 321-4500 Facsimile: (916) 321-4555 Attorneys for Defendants ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC; FULTON, FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLP; and ANN K. MERRILL 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 FRESNO DIVISION 13 14 JEAN CARR, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00890-LJO-GSA v. STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC, FULTON, FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLP, a New York Limited Liability Partnership, ANN K. MERRILL, a California attorney, DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. 20 21 It is hereby stipulated by the parties through their respective counsel to request that the 22 Court continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, currently scheduled to occur on August 2, 23 2011, at 10:00 a.m. The parties propose that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference be re-set to 24 occur on August 23, 2011, at 10:30, in Courtroom 10. 25 This request is made due to a conflict in counsel for Defendants’ schedule on August 2, 26 2011, which requires her attendance in the California - Southern District for a Mandatory Early 27 Neutral Evaluation with clients’ required attendance. Upon determining that the appearance in 28 K RONICK , M OSKOVITZ , T IEDEMANN & G IRARD ATTOR NEYS AT LAW SACR A ME NT O 977065.1 12435.003 -1- 1:11-CV-00890-LJO-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 San Diego was not going to be postponed, counsel for Defendants immediately contacted counsel 2 for Plaintiff, who agreed to stipulate to this request based upon these facts. 3 4 Dated: July 27, 2011 5 Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation By: /s/ June D. Coleman June D. Coleman Candice L. Fields Attorneys for Defendants ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC; FULTON, FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLP; and ANN K. MERRILL 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: July 27, 2011 Law Office of Rick D. Banks By:_/s/ Rick D. Banks__ Rick D. Banks Attorney for Plaintiff JEAN CARR 11 12 ____ 13 14 15 ORDER 16 Based on the parties’ stipulation, the Initial Scheduling Conference is continued from 17 18 August 2, 2011, to August 23, 2011, at 10:30 a.m., in Department 10. 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. July 28, 2011 Dated: 23 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 DEAC_Signature-END: 6i0kij8d 26 27 28 K RONICK , M OSKOVITZ , T IEDEMANN & G IRARD ATTOR NEYS AT LAW SACR A ME NT O 977065.1 12435.003 -2- 1:11-CV-00890-LJO-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?