Carr v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a continuance of the Scheduling Conference currently set for 8/2/2011 and CONTINUING it 8/23/2011 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin; order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/28/2011. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
JUNE D. COLEMAN, State Bar No. 191890
jcoleman@kmtg.com
CANDICE L. FIELDS, State Bar No. 172174
cfields@kmtg.com
KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN &
GIRARD
A Law Corporation
400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone:
(916) 321-4500
Facsimile:
(916) 321-4555
Attorneys for Defendants
ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC;
FULTON, FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLP; and
ANN K. MERRILL
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
FRESNO DIVISION
13
14
JEAN CARR,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00890-LJO-GSA
v.
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC, FULTON,
FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLP, a New
York Limited Liability Partnership, ANN
K. MERRILL, a California attorney, DOES
1 through 10,
Defendants.
20
21
It is hereby stipulated by the parties through their respective counsel to request that the
22
Court continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, currently scheduled to occur on August 2,
23
2011, at 10:00 a.m. The parties propose that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference be re-set to
24
occur on August 23, 2011, at 10:30, in Courtroom 10.
25
This request is made due to a conflict in counsel for Defendants’ schedule on August 2,
26
2011, which requires her attendance in the California - Southern District for a Mandatory Early
27
Neutral Evaluation with clients’ required attendance. Upon determining that the appearance in
28
K RONICK , M OSKOVITZ ,
T IEDEMANN & G IRARD
ATTOR NEYS AT LAW
SACR A ME NT O
977065.1 12435.003
-1-
1:11-CV-00890-LJO-GSA
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
1
San Diego was not going to be postponed, counsel for Defendants immediately contacted counsel
2
for Plaintiff, who agreed to stipulate to this request based upon these facts.
3
4
Dated: July 27, 2011
5
Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard
A Law Corporation
By: /s/ June D. Coleman
June D. Coleman
Candice L. Fields
Attorneys for Defendants
ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC; FULTON,
FRIEDMAN & GULLACE, LLP; and
ANN K. MERRILL
6
7
8
9
10
Dated: July 27, 2011
Law Office of Rick D. Banks
By:_/s/ Rick D. Banks__
Rick D. Banks
Attorney for Plaintiff JEAN CARR
11
12
____
13
14
15
ORDER
16
Based on the parties’ stipulation, the Initial Scheduling Conference is continued from
17
18
August 2, 2011, to August 23, 2011, at 10:30 a.m., in Department 10.
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 28, 2011
Dated:
23
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
26
27
28
K RONICK , M OSKOVITZ ,
T IEDEMANN & G IRARD
ATTOR NEYS AT LAW
SACR A ME NT O
977065.1 12435.003
-2-
1:11-CV-00890-LJO-GSA
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?