Howard v. Bank of America, Inc.

Filing 11

CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER. MDL No. 2138. Action is REMANDED to the Eastern District of California. Case reopened. (Robles, S)

Download PDF
Case MDL No. 2138 Document 175 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION MDL No. 2138 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER The transferee court in this litigation has advised the Panel that coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings in the action(s) on this conditional remand order have been completed and that remand to the transferor court(s), as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), is appropriate. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action(s) on this conditional remand order be remanded to its/their respective transferor court(s). IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the transmittal of this order to the transferee clerk for filing shall be stayed 7 days from the date of this order. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.4(a), the parties shall furnish the Clerk for the District of Kansas with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded. FOR THE PANEL: Oct 14, 2015 Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 2138 Document 175 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 2 IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION MDL No. 2138 SCHEDULE FOR CRO TRANSFEREE DIST DIV. C.A.NO. KS 2 11−02342 TRANSFEROR DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CAE 1 11−00891 CASE CAPTION Howard v. Bank of America, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?