Howard v. Bank of America, Inc.
Filing
11
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER. MDL No. 2138. Action is REMANDED to the Eastern District of California. Case reopened. (Robles, S)
Case MDL No. 2138 Document 175 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA WAGE AND HOUR
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION
MDL No. 2138
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER
The transferee court in this litigation has advised the Panel that coordinated or consolidated pretrial
proceedings in the action(s) on this conditional remand order have been completed and that remand
to the transferor court(s), as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), is appropriate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action(s) on this conditional remand order be remanded to
its/their respective transferor court(s).
IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the transmittal of this order to the transferee clerk for
filing shall be stayed 7 days from the date of this order. If any party files a notice of opposition with
the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the
Panel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United
States District Court for the District of Kansas.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.4(a), the parties shall furnish the Clerk for
the District of Kansas with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded.
FOR THE PANEL:
Oct 14, 2015
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
Case MDL No. 2138 Document 175 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 2
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA WAGE AND HOUR
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION
MDL No. 2138
SCHEDULE FOR CRO
TRANSFEREE
DIST DIV. C.A.NO.
KS 2 11−02342
TRANSFEROR
DIST DIV. C.A.NO.
CAE 1 11−00891
CASE CAPTION
Howard v. Bank of America, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?