Howard v. Bank of America, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER SETTING an Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/2/2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/18/2016. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

NATALIE HOWARD,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:11-CV-00891 LJO EPG
ORDER SETTING MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

v.
BANK OF AMERICA,
Defendant.

DATE: May 2, 2016
TIME: 9:30 A.M.
COURTROOM: 10 (6th Floor)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to the Conditional Remand Order of February 1, 2016, issued by the United
States Judicial Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation, document [11], it is ordered that all parties
attend a formal Scheduling Conference before United States Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean,
in Courtroom 10 at the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721.
Appearance at Scheduling Conference
Attendance at the Scheduling Conference is mandatory for all parties. Parties may appear
by their counsel, if represented. If a party is not represented by counsel, they must appear
personally at the Scheduling Conference. Telephonic appearances are not available for pro se
parties, i.e., those not represented by counsel. Trial counsel should participate in this Scheduling
1

1

Conference whenever possible.

2

If one or more parties are represented by counsel and wish to appear telephonically,

3

counsel shall contact Amanda Martinez, Courtroom Deputy Clerk, at [phone] sufficiently

4

in advance of the conference so that a notation can be placed on the court calendar. If more than

5

one party is appearing telephonically, counsel shall decide who will be responsible for arranging a

6

one-line conference call and shall initiate the call at the designated time. After all parties are on

7

the line, the call should then be placed to Judge Grosjean’s chambers at [phone].

8

Additionally, counsel are directed to indicate on the face page of their Joint Scheduling Report

9

that the conference will be telephonic.

10

Joint Scheduling Report

11

A Joint Scheduling Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel shall be

12

electronically filed in CM/ECF, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference and shall be

13

emailed in Word format to [e-mail]. The Joint Scheduling Report shall

14

indicate the date, time, and courtroom of the Scheduling Conference. This information is to be

15

placed opposite the caption on the first page of the Report.

16

At least twenty (20) days prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, trial counsel for

17

all parties shall conduct a conference at a mutually agreed upon time and place. This should

18

preferably be a personal conference between all counsel but a telephonic conference call

19

involving all counsel/pro se parties is permissible. The Joint Scheduling Report shall contain the

20

following items by corresponding numbered paragraphs:

21
22

1.

Summary of the factual and legal contentions set forth in the pleadings of each

party, including the relief sought by any party presently before the Court.

23

2.

Summary of major disputed facts and contentions of law.

24

3.

A proposed deadline for amendments to pleadings. Any proposed amendment to

25

the pleadings shall be referenced in the Scheduling Conference Report. If the matter cannot be

26

resolved at the Scheduling Conference, the moving party shall file a motion to amend in

27

accordance with the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California.

28

4.

The status of all matters which are presently set before the Court, e.g., hearings of
2

1

motions, etc.

2

5.

3

proposed dates:

4

A complete and detailed discovery plan addressing the following issues and

a.

A

date

for

the

exchange

of

initial

disclosures

required

by

5

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) or a statement that disclosures have already been

6

exchanged;

7

b.

A firm cut-off date for non-expert discovery. When setting this date, the

8

parties should consider that discovery cutoffs requires that motions to

9

compel be filed and heard sufficiently in advance of the deadline so that the

10
11

Court may grant effective relief within the allotted discovery time;
c.

12

A firm date for disclosure of expert witnesses, required by Fed. R. Civ. P.
26(a)(2), including a date for disclosure of rebuttal experts;

13

d.

A firm cut-off date for all expert witness discovery;

14

e.

Any proposed changes in the limits on discovery imposed by

15
16

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b); 30(a)(2)(A), (B); 30(d); or 33(a);
f.

Whether the parties anticipate the need for a protective order relating to the

17

discovery of information relating to a trade secret or other confidential

18

research, development, or commercial information;

19

g.

20
21

Any issues or proposals relating to the timing, sequencing, phasing or
scheduling of discovery; and

h.

22

Whether the parties anticipate the need to take discovery outside the United
States and, if so, a description of the proposed discovery.

23

Additional Disclosures Related to Electronic Discovery

24

1.

Discovery Relating to Electronic, Digital and/or Magnetic Data. Prior to a

25

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, counsel should carefully investigate their respective

26

client’s information management system so that they are knowledgeable as to its

27

operation, including how information is stored and how it can be retrieved. Counsel shall

28

also conduct a reasonable review of their respective client’s computer files to ascertain the
3

1

contents thereof, including archival and legacy data (outdated formats or media), and

2

disclose in initial discovery (self-executing routine discovery) the computer-based

3

evidence which may be used to support claims or defenses.

4

2.

The parties shall meet and confer regarding the following matters during

5

the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, and address the status of Electronic Discovery and

6

any disagreements in their Statement, including:

7

a.

8

parties will take to segregate and preserve computer-based

9

information in order to avoid accusations of spoliation.

Preservation: The parties shall attempt to agree on steps the

10

b.

11

agree as to the scope of e-mail discovery and attempt to agree upon

12

an e-mail search protocol. The parties should seek to agree on

13

search terms, custodians, and date ranges in advance of the

14

Conference so that any disputes can be addressed at the Conference.

15

c.

16

parties should confer regarding procedures for inadvertent

17

production of privileged electronic material, including any

18

obligations to notify the other party, and procedures for bringing

19

any disputes promptly to the Court.

20

d.

21

or not restoration of deleted information may be necessary, the

22

extent to which restoration of deleted information is needed, and

23

who will bear the costs of restoration; and the parties shall attempt

24

to agree whether or not back-up data may be necessary, the extent

25

to which backup data is needed and who will bear the cost of

26

obtaining back-up data.

27
28

6.

Scope of E-mail Discovery: The parties shall attempt to

Inadvertent Production of Privileged Information: The

Data Restoration: The parties shall confer regarding whether

Dates agreed to by all counsel for:
a.

Filing non-dispositive and dispositive pre-trial motions (except motions in
4

1

limine or other trial motions).

2

deadlines, the non-dispositive filing deadline shall be at least eight (8)

3

weeks prior to the dispositive motion filing deadline. The dispositive

4

motion filing deadline shall be at least twelve (12) weeks prior to the

5

proposed Pre-Trial Conference date, and the hearing on dispositive motions

6

shall be at least sixty (60) days before the proposed Pre-trial Conference

7

date.

When formulating the dates for these

8

b.

A Pre-Trial Conference Date.

9

c.

A Trial date. This date should be at least sixty (60) days after the proposed

10
11

Pre-Trial Conference date.
7.

The parties are encouraged to discuss settlement, and must include a statement in

12

the Joint Scheduling Report as to the possibility of settlement. The parties shall indicate when

13

they desire a settlement conference, e.g., before further discovery, after discovery, after pre-trial

14

motions, etc. Among other things, counsel will be expected to discuss the possibility of settlement

15

at the Scheduling Conference. Note that, even if settlement negotiations are progressing, counsel

16

are expected to comply with the requirements of this Order unless otherwise excused by the

17

Court. If the entire case is settled, counsel shall promptly inform the Court. In the event of

18

settlement, counsel's presence at the conference, as well as the Joint Scheduling Report, will not

19

be required.

20

8.

A statement as to whether the case is a jury or non-jury case. The parties shall

21

briefly outline their respective positions if there is a disagreement as to whether a jury trial has

22

been timely demanded, or as to whether a jury trial is available on some or all of the claims.

23
24
25

9.

An estimate of the number of trial days is required. If the parties cannot agree,

each party shall give his or her best estimate.
10.

The parties' position regarding consent to proceed before a United States

26

magistrate judge. Note that the parties need not make a final decision on the issue of consent

27

until after the Scheduling Conference, but should state their current position in this Statement and

28

expect to make a final decision soon after the Scheduling Conference.
5

1

The parties may wish to consider that, when a civil trial is set before the district judges in

2

the Fresno Division, any criminal trial that conflicts with the civil trial will take priority, even if

3

the civil trial was set first. Continuances of civil trials under these circumstances may no longer

4

be entertained, absent good cause, but the civil trial may instead trail from day to day or week to

5

week until the completion of either the criminal case or the older civil case.

6
7
8
9
10

Parties are free to withhold consent or decline magistrate jurisdiction without adverse
substantive consequences.
11.

Whether either party requests bifurcation or phasing of trial or has any other

suggestion for shortening or expediting discovery, pre-trial motions or trial.
12.

Whether this matter is related to any matter pending in this court or any other

11

court, including bankruptcy court.

12

Scheduling Order

13

Following the Scheduling Conference, the Court will issue a Scheduling Order with the

14

benefit of the input of the parties. Once issued, the dates in the Scheduling Order shall be firm

15

and no extension shall be given without permission from the Court.

16

Lack of Participation in the Joint Scheduling Report

17

If any party fails to participate in the preparation of the Joint Scheduling Report, the non-

18

offending party shall detail the party’s effort to get the offending party to participate in the Joint

19

Scheduling Report. The non-offending party shall still file the report one (1) full week prior to

20

the Mandatory Scheduling Conference and shall list the non-offending party’s position on the

21

listed issues and proposed dates for a schedule. Absent good cause, the dates proposed by the

22

non-offending party will be presumed to be the dates offered by the parties. The offending party

23

may be subject to sanctions, including monetary sanctions to compensate the non-offending

24

party’s time and effort incurred in seeking compliance with this Scheduling Order.

25

Important Chambers' Information

26

The parties are directed to the Court’s website at www.caed.uscourts.gov under Judges;

27

Grosjean (EPG); Standard Information (in the area entitled “Case Management

28

Procedures”) for specific information regarding Chambers’ procedures. Information about law
6

1

and motion, scheduling conferences, telephonic appearances, and discovery disputes is provided

2

at this link.

3

Sanctions for Failure to Comply

4

Should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to appear at the Mandatory Scheduling

5

Conference, or fail to comply with the directions as set forth above, an ex parte hearing may be

6

held and contempt sanctions, including monetary sanctions, dismissal, default, or other

7

appropriate judgment, may be imposed and/or ordered.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

DATED: March 18, 2016

/s/ ERICA P. GROSJEAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7