Manning v. Cullin
Filing
3
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:11-cv-1342 GGH) to Fresno (1:11-cv-0897 MJS) signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/2/11. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TONY MASON MANNING,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. CIV S-11-1342 GGH P
vs.
VINCENT CULLIN,
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER
/
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of
17
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma
18
pauperis. In his application, which appears to attack the underlying conviction, petitioner
19
challenges a conviction issued by the Fresno County Superior Court. Fresno County is part of
20
the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See
21
Local Rule 120(d).
22
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in
23
the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper
24
division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the
25
court. This court will not rule on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis.
26
/////
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis;
3
2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
4
District of California sitting in Fresno; and
5
6
3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and
shall be filed at:
7
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
8
9
10
DATED: June 2, 2011
11
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
12
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
GGH:md
mann1342.109
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?