Gutierrez v. Sekhon et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION For Dismissal of Action, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/30/11: The action is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety; The parties having stipulated to dismiss this action pursuant to Rule 41, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4

K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Natividad Gutierrez

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

NATIVIDAD GUTIERREZ,

) No. 1:11-CV-00903-AWI-BAM
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
vs.
)
MAJOR SINGH SEKHON dba BAG O BAG )
)
FOOD STORE, et al.
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

18
19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Natividad Gutierrez

20

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Major Singh Sekhon dba Bag O Bag and Avtar Singh, the parties

21

to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

22

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its

23

entirety.

24

Date: December 30, 2011

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

25
26

/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Natividad Gutierrez

27
28

///

Gutierrez v. Sekhon, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal

Page 1

1

Date: December 30, 2011

FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

2
3
4

/s/ James Fessenden
James Fessenden, Attorneys for
Defendants Major Singh Sekhon dba Bag
O Bag Food Store and Avtar Singh

5
6
7
8

ORDER

9

The parties having stipulated to dismiss this action pursuant to Rule 41, the Clerk of the

10
11

Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

Dated:

16
17

December 30, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

0m8i788

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Gutierrez v. Sekhon, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal

Page 2