Moran v. Dutra et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING Certain Claims and Defendants signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/10/2012. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NICHOLAS MORAN, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 K. DUTRA, et al., 11 12 1:11-cv-914-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF No. 12) Defendants. _______________________________/ 13 14 Plaintiff Nicholas Moran (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action 15 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 17 On September 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations, 18 recommending dismissal of certain of Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff 19 has failed to file objections. 20 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this 21 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 22 Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 23 analysis. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 -1- 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 21, 2012, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment inadequate medical care 4 claim against Defendants Ryan and Dedee; 5 3. 6 Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendants Dutra and Auten; 7 4. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants John Does # 1-20 be dismissed; and 8 5. Defendants John Does #1-20 be dismissed from this action. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 October 10, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?