Moran v. Dutra et al
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING Certain Claims and Defendants signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/10/2012. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
NICHOLAS MORAN,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
K. DUTRA, et al.,
11
12
1:11-cv-914-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
(ECF No. 12)
Defendants.
_______________________________/
13
14
Plaintiff Nicholas Moran (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action
15
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
16
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
17
On September 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations,
18
recommending dismissal of certain of Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff
19
has failed to file objections.
20
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this
21
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
22
Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
23
analysis.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
-1-
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 21, 2012, are adopted in full;
3
2.
Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment inadequate medical care
4
claim against Defendants Ryan and Dedee;
5
3.
6
Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his Eighth Amendment excessive force claim
against Defendants Dutra and Auten;
7
4.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants John Does # 1-20 be dismissed; and
8
5.
Defendants John Does #1-20 be dismissed from this action.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
b9ed48
October 10, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?