Moran v. Dutra et al

Filing 157

ORDER and WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/1/16. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NICOLAS MORAN, Case No. 1:11-cv-00914-LJO-MJS (PC) Plaintiff, v. K. DUTRA, et al., ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM Defendants. / Nicolas Moran, CDCR # E-12779, a necessary and material witness in a settlement conference in this case on July 1, 2016, is confined in Avenal State Prison (ASP), in the custody of the Warden. In order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng at the U. S. District Court, Courtroom #6, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California 93721, on Friday, July 1, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court, commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a settlement conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as ordered by the court. 2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM To: Warden, ASP, P. O. Box 8, Avenal, California 93204: WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge Seng at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as ordered by the court. FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 1, 2016 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?