Burgess v. Raya, et al.

Filing 38

SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - NOTICE AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS for opposing 35 MOTION to DISMISS signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/23/2014. (Filing Deadline: 2/18/2014). (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DWAYNE L. BURGESS, Case No. 1:11-cv-00921-LJO-JLT Plaintiff, SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - NOTICE AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. 12 (Doc. 35) v. 13 RAYA, et al 14 15 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil action. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on 18 December 20, 2013. Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012) and Wyatt v. 19 Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2003), the Court hereby notifies Plaintiff of the following rights 20 and requirements for opposing the motion: 21 22 23 1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). 2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to 24 Defendants' motion to dismiss. Local Rule 230(l). If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition or a 25 statement of non-opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed, with prejudice, for 26 failure to prosecute. Local Rule requires the opposition, or statement of non-opposition be filed 27 not more than 21 days after the date of service of the motion. Id. However, since this time frame 28 has already lapsed, Plaintiff is granted 21 days from the service of this order to file his opposition 1 1 or statement of non-opposition. 2 3. If responding to Defendants' 12(b) motion to dismiss, Plaintiff may not simply rely on 3 allegations in the complaint. Instead, Plaintiff must oppose the motion by setting forth specific 4 facts in declaration(s) and/or by submitting other evidence. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 43(c); Ritza, 837 5 F.2d at 369. If Plaintiff does not submit his own evidence in opposition, the Court may conclude 6 that Plaintiff has no evidence to oppose the motion and the case will be dismissed in whole or in 7 part. 8 9 10 4. Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value. 5. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure, or the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California may result in the imposition of 12 sanctions including but not limited to dismissal of the action or entry of default. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 23, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?