Burgess v. Raya, et al.

Filing 64

ORDER GRANTING Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery and for Plaintiff to File an Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment re 61 signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/10/2015. Responses to Discovery due within thirty (30) days. Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment due within sixty (60) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DWAYNE L. BURGESS, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. RAYA, et al, 15 Defendants. 1:11-cv-00921-LJO-JLT (PC) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY AND FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 61) 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 ' 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding on his claims against Defendants Raya, Garcia, Polanco, and 19 Fernandez for battery under California law and excessive force in violation of the Eighth 20 Amendment and against Defendants Raya and Polanco under the additional claims of conspiracy 21 and retaliation in violation of the First Amendment as stated in the Third Amended Complaint. 22 (Docs. 27, 29, 32.) 23 On March 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that Defendants' pending motion for 24 summary judgment (Doc. 60) either be denied or postponed as the parties have been amicably 25 working together and he has not received full responses from Defendants to his outstanding 26 discovery, but had been assured that they were forthcoming; and after their receipt he intends to 27 file an opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 61.) Defendants filed a 28 statement of non-opposition concurring that the parties have been very amicable in this action and 1 1 that they are willing to provide responses not previously provided to Plaintiff in the next thirty 2 days and for Plaintiff to file his opposition to their motion for summary judgment in the next sixty 3 days. (Doc. 62.) Given the parties' agreement, the motion is deemed submitted. 4 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. 6 Defendants shall serve their response to all of Plaintiff's outstanding discovery within 30 days from the date of service of this order; 7 2. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within 60 days from the date of service of this order;1 and 8 9 3. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to file an opposition or a statement of non- 10 opposition within 60 days from the date of service of this order will result in 11 dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 14 March 10, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 A Third Informational Order containing the requirements to oppose a motion for summary judgment is issuing concurrently herewith. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?