Linthecome v. Junious et al

Filing 22

ORDER Addressing Plaintiff's 20 Objections to Findings and Recommendations signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 04/25/2012. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

MARCUS LEON LINTHECOME,

10

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00923-AWI–BAM PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

v.
11
MAURICE JUNIOUS, et al.,
12

(ECF No. 20)
Defendants.

13

/

14
Plaintiff Marcus Leon Linthecome is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
15
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 9, 2012, findings and
16
recommendations issued recommending denying Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief and granting
17
Plaintiff thirty days in which to file objections. (ECF No. 18.) On March 29, 2012, the undersigned
18
issued an order adopting the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff filed a
19
response to the findings and recommendations on April 16, 2012, stating that he did not receive the
20
page of the findings and recommendations requiring him to file his objections within thirty days.
21
(ECF No. 20.)
22
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court conducted a de
23
novo review of this case. After a carefully review of the entire file, the Court adopted the findings
24
and recommendations, finding them to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. The Court
25
has considered Plaintiff’s response and finds the order adopting remains valid and intact.

In

26
addition, the response notes Plaintiff has now been released from custody, making any motion for
27
injunction against prison officials moot.
28
1

1
2

The April 16, 2012 response is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated:
0m8i78

April 25, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2