Pickering v. Clark et al
Filing
38
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Request for Documents 37 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/29/14: 30-Day Deadline. (Attachments: # 1 USM Instructions Packet) (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WAYNE L. PICKERING,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
Case No. 1:11-cv-00937 LJO DLB PC
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS
(Document 37)
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
ENENMOH,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff Wayne L. Pickering (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in
this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
20
21
On May 23, 2013, the Court determined that Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint
(“SAC”) did not state any cognizable claims against any Defendants, and dismissed it without leave
to amend. Plaintiff appealed the dismissal.
22
23
24
On August 1, 2014, the Ninth Circuit reversed in part and remanded the action for further
proceedings. The Court determined that at the screening stage, Plaintiff’s SAC stated a cognizable
Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Enenmoh.
25
On November 26, 2014, Plaintiff was instructed to return service documents.1
26
27
On December 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request for documents. He states that he did not
receive the documents that the Court ordered be sent with the November 26, 2014, order.
28
1
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint will be addressed by separate order.
1
Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to resend the November
1
2
26, 2014, order, with all required documents, to Plaintiff at his new address.
Plaintiff’s service documents will be due within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this
3
4
order.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
December 29, 2014
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?