Fugawa v. Trimble et al

Filing 81

ORDER Requiring Parties to Notify Court Whether a Settlement Conference Would be Beneficial signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/19/2018. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Plaintiff, 7 ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL Defendant. 6 8 1:11-cv-00966-LJO-SKO (PC) PETER FUGAWA, 14-DAY DEADLINE v. DeARMOND, 9 10 This action is scheduled for trial in front of the District Judge on January 22, 2019. 11 12 However, given the age of this action and the Court’s ever burgeoning case load and the delays 13 this causes, a court supervised settlement conference may be beneficial in this action. 14 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that within 14 days of the date of service of this order, the 15 parties SHALL notify the Court whether they believe, in good faith, that a settlement conference 16 is likely to be fruitful. Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement conference would 17 18 be conducted by Magistrate Judge Oberto. The Court deems the deviation from the Local Rule to 19 be appropriate and in the interests of the parties and justice and sound case management in this 20 action. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be conducted by a judicial officer 21 who is not assigned to this case, that party is directed to notify the Court in the response to 22 23 24 this order, that the party prefers another judicial officer to be assigned to handle the conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: October 19, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 Sheila K. Oberto 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?