Dean v. McDonald
Filing
31
ORDER Granting Petitioner's Motion To File Oversized Brief (Doc. 26 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/6/2012. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JERMAINE MICHAEL DEAN,
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
M. McDONALD,
15
Respondent.
16
) Case No.: 1:11-cv-00970-LJO-JLT
)
) ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION
) TO FILE OVERSIZED BRIEF (Doc. 26)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through retained counsel with a petition for writ of
18
19
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
On September 13, 2011, Respondent filed an Answer in this case. (Doc. 22). On November
20
21
14, 2011, Petitioner filed his Traverse and supporting memorandum of authorities. (Doc. 27). Along
22
with the Traverse, Petitioner filed the instant motion to file an oversized brief in support of the
23
Traverse. (Doc. 26). Although the clerk of the Court filed the Traverse and supporting brief as
24
submitted, thus making the instant motion moot, the Court will nevertheless grant the motion nunc pro
25
tunc to November 14, 2011.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:
1
1. Petitioner’s motion to file an oversized brief in support of his Traverse (Doc. 26), is
2
GRANTED nunc pro tunc to November 14, 2011.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
Dated:
June 6, 2012
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
9j7khijed
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?