Dean v. McDonald

Filing 31

ORDER Granting Petitioner's Motion To File Oversized Brief (Doc. 26 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/6/2012. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JERMAINE MICHAEL DEAN, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 M. McDONALD, 15 Respondent. 16 ) Case No.: 1:11-cv-00970-LJO-JLT ) ) ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION ) TO FILE OVERSIZED BRIEF (Doc. 26) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through retained counsel with a petition for writ of 18 19 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 13, 2011, Respondent filed an Answer in this case. (Doc. 22). On November 20 21 14, 2011, Petitioner filed his Traverse and supporting memorandum of authorities. (Doc. 27). Along 22 with the Traverse, Petitioner filed the instant motion to file an oversized brief in support of the 23 Traverse. (Doc. 26). Although the clerk of the Court filed the Traverse and supporting brief as 24 submitted, thus making the instant motion moot, the Court will nevertheless grant the motion nunc pro 25 tunc to November 14, 2011. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 1 1. Petitioner’s motion to file an oversized brief in support of his Traverse (Doc. 26), is 2 GRANTED nunc pro tunc to November 14, 2011. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: June 6, 2012 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 9j7khijed 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?