Stanley v. State of California et al
Filing
42
ORDER to Counsel to SHOW CAUSE Why Trial in this Matter Should Not Be Advanced to June 9, 2014, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/24/2014. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SOLOMON T. STANLEY,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:11-cv-00981 JLT
ORDER TO COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
TRIAL IN THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT BE
ADVANCED TO JUNE 9, 2014
16
17
This matter has been pending in this court since June 13, 2011. (Doc. 1) Recently, this matter
18
was reassigned from the District Judge such that an earlier trial date is now possible. Since October
19
2013, very little has occurred that could advance the progress of this case. Therefore, within 10 days,
20
counsel SHALL show cause in writing why trial in this matter should not be advanced to June 9, 2014.
21
In their responses, if either counsel disagree that June 9, 2014 is an acceptable date, they SHALL state
22
their reasons why and SHALL identify which of either May 12 or May 21 is their preferred trial date.
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 24, 2014
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?