Bradford v. Vella-Lopez et al

Filing 95

ORDER DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Re-Serve 92 Order Filed February 13, 2015, and GRANTING Thirty-Day Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/24/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, 11 Plaintiff, v. 12 13 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO RE-SERVE ORDER FILED FEBRUARY 13, 2015, AND GRANTING THIRTY-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME I. VELLA-LOPEZ, et al., 14 Case No. 1:11-cv-00990-AWI-SKO (PC) Defendants. _____________________________________/ (Docs. 92-94) 15 16 Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 17 forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 25, 2011. This 18 action is currently proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed January 31, 2014, 19 against Defendants Brooks and Yu for violating Plaintiff’s right to adequate medical care under 20 the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. 21 On February 13, 2015, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendant Yu’s motion 22 to dismiss, and ordered Plaintiff to furnish security in the amount of $2,295.00 within thirty days. 23 On February 20, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, and on February 23, 2015, 24 Defendant Yu requested an extension of time on Plaintiff’s behalf given his address change. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 In light of Plaintiff’s address change, the Clerk’s Office shall re-serve the order on 2 Plaintiff, and Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order within which to 3 furnish security in compliance with the order. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 24, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?