Agency Solutions.com, LLC v. Trizetto Group, Inc.

Filing 73

STIPULATION and ORDER to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Resolution of Plaintiff's Appeal of this Court's Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/14/2011. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP ROBERT D. BECKER (Cal. Bar No. 160648) E-mail: rbecker@manatt.com RONALD S. KATZ (Cal. Bar No. 085713) E-mail: rkatz@manatt.com NEIL SWARTZBERG (Cal. Bar No. 215133) E-mail: nswartzberg@manatt.com 1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006 Telephone: (650) 812-1300 Facsimile: (650) 213-0260 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP CHRISTOPHER L. WANGER (Cal. Bar No. 164751) E-mail: cwanger@manatt.com One Embarcadero Center, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 291-7400 Facsimile: (415) 291-7474 Attorneys for Plaintiff AGENCY SOLUTIONS.COM, LLC d.b.a. HEALTHCONNECT SYSTEMS 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 FRESNO DIVISION 16 17 AGENCY SOLUTIONS.COM, LLC d.b.a. HEALTHCONNECT SYSTEMS, Civil Action No. 11-cv-01014-AWI-GSA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DISTRICT COURT PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION OF PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL OF THIS COURT’S ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 THE TRIZETTO GROUP, INC., 21 Defendant, 22 Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii, Court 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW PALO AL TO 300803367.1 STIPULATION RE: STAY PENDING APPEAL CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-01014-AWI-GSA 1 WHEREAS, on September 13, 2011, this Court entered an Order denying Plaintiff 2 Agency Solutions.com, LLC d.b.a. HealthConnect Systems (HCS)’s Motion for Preliminary 3 Injunction (Dkt.# 61, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary 4 Injunction, herein “Order on PI Motion”); 5 6 WHEREAS, on October 11, 2011, HCS filed a Notice of Appeal appealing to the Ninth Circuit the Order on PI Motion (Dkt.# 65); 7 WHEREAS, HCS and Defendant The TriZetto Group, Inc. (TZG), agree that it is 8 appropriate to stay proceedings in this Court pending resolution of HCS’s appeal of the Order on 9 PI Motion – provided that the dates set forth in the current Scheduling Order (Dkt.# 64) are 10 adjusted to take into account the duration of such stay; 11 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE UNDERSIGNED THAT: 12 1. 13 pending resolution of HCS’s appeal of the Order on PI Motion; specifically, the stay will 14 remain in effect until the Ninth Circuit issues its Mandate on HCS’s appeal of the Order 15 on PI Motion. 16 2. 17 resolution of the appeal, by approximately the same number of days that this stay remains 18 in effect. 19 3. 20 action within 14 days after the Ninth Circuit issues its Mandate on the appeal. All proceedings in this action in this Court are stayed, effective immediately, The dates set forth in the current Scheduling Order will be extended, upon The parties shall file a joint report setting forth a new proposed schedule for this 21 22 23 IT IS SO STIPULATED Dated: October 13, 2011. MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 24 By:/s/ Ronald S. Katz Ronald S. Katz 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff Agency Solutions.com, LLC d.b.a. HealthConnect Systems 27 28 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW PALO AL TO 300803367.1 1 STIPULATION RE: STAY PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-01014-AWI-GSA 1 Dated: October 13, 2011. 2 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By:/s/ Brian M. Daucher (as authorized on 10/13/11) BRIAN M. DAUCHER 3 4 Attorneys for Defendant THE TRIZETTO GROUP, INC. 5 6 ORDER 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: October 14, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Sig nature-END: 14 0m8i788 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW PALO AL TO 300803367.1 2 STIPULATION RE: STAY PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-01014-AWI-GSA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?