Agency Solutions.com, LLC v. Trizetto Group, Inc.
Filing
73
STIPULATION and ORDER to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Resolution of Plaintiff's Appeal of this Court's Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/14/2011. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
ROBERT D. BECKER (Cal. Bar No. 160648)
E-mail: rbecker@manatt.com
RONALD S. KATZ (Cal. Bar No. 085713)
E-mail: rkatz@manatt.com
NEIL SWARTZBERG (Cal. Bar No. 215133)
E-mail: nswartzberg@manatt.com
1001 Page Mill Road, Building 2
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1006
Telephone: (650) 812-1300
Facsimile: (650) 213-0260
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
CHRISTOPHER L. WANGER (Cal. Bar No. 164751)
E-mail: cwanger@manatt.com
One Embarcadero Center, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 291-7400
Facsimile: (415) 291-7474
Attorneys for Plaintiff
AGENCY SOLUTIONS.COM, LLC d.b.a.
HEALTHCONNECT SYSTEMS
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
FRESNO DIVISION
16
17
AGENCY SOLUTIONS.COM, LLC d.b.a.
HEALTHCONNECT SYSTEMS,
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01014-AWI-GSA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO STAY DISTRICT
COURT PROCEEDINGS PENDING
RESOLUTION OF PLAINTIFF’S
APPEAL OF THIS COURT’S ORDER
ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
18
Plaintiff,
19
v.
20
THE TRIZETTO GROUP, INC.,
21
Defendant,
22
Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii, Court 2
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ANATT , P HELPS &
P HILLIPS , LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
PALO AL TO
300803367.1
STIPULATION RE: STAY PENDING APPEAL
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-01014-AWI-GSA
1
WHEREAS, on September 13, 2011, this Court entered an Order denying Plaintiff
2
Agency Solutions.com, LLC d.b.a. HealthConnect Systems (HCS)’s Motion for Preliminary
3
Injunction (Dkt.# 61, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary
4
Injunction, herein “Order on PI Motion”);
5
6
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2011, HCS filed a Notice of Appeal appealing to the Ninth
Circuit the Order on PI Motion (Dkt.# 65);
7
WHEREAS, HCS and Defendant The TriZetto Group, Inc. (TZG), agree that it is
8
appropriate to stay proceedings in this Court pending resolution of HCS’s appeal of the Order on
9
PI Motion – provided that the dates set forth in the current Scheduling Order (Dkt.# 64) are
10
adjusted to take into account the duration of such stay;
11
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE UNDERSIGNED THAT:
12
1.
13
pending resolution of HCS’s appeal of the Order on PI Motion; specifically, the stay will
14
remain in effect until the Ninth Circuit issues its Mandate on HCS’s appeal of the Order
15
on PI Motion.
16
2.
17
resolution of the appeal, by approximately the same number of days that this stay remains
18
in effect.
19
3.
20
action within 14 days after the Ninth Circuit issues its Mandate on the appeal.
All proceedings in this action in this Court are stayed, effective immediately,
The dates set forth in the current Scheduling Order will be extended, upon
The parties shall file a joint report setting forth a new proposed schedule for this
21
22
23
IT IS SO STIPULATED
Dated:
October 13, 2011.
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
24
By:/s/ Ronald S. Katz
Ronald S. Katz
25
26
Attorneys for Plaintiff Agency Solutions.com,
LLC d.b.a. HealthConnect Systems
27
28
M ANATT , P HELPS &
P HILLIPS , LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
PALO AL TO
300803367.1
1
STIPULATION RE: STAY PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01014-AWI-GSA
1
Dated:
October 13, 2011.
2
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP
By:/s/ Brian M. Daucher (as authorized on 10/13/11)
BRIAN M. DAUCHER
3
4
Attorneys for Defendant
THE TRIZETTO GROUP, INC.
5
6
ORDER
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated: October 14, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Sig nature-END:
14
0m8i788
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ANATT , P HELPS &
P HILLIPS , LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
PALO AL TO
300803367.1
2
STIPULATION RE: STAY PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01014-AWI-GSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?