Durden v. CDCR et al

Filing 11

ORDER Rejecting Plaintiff's Filings for Failure to Comply with Local Rule 130, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 8/1/2011. (Document returned to Plaintiff per this order)(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LARRY FRANCIS DURDEN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 1:11-cv-01019-AWI-GBC ORDER REJECTING PLAINTIFF’S FILINGS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULE 130 CDCR, et al., 14 CASE NO. Defendants. / CLERK TO RETURN DOCUMENTS 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 Plaintiff Larry Francis Durden (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Plaintiff filed this action on June 6, 2011. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff mailed documents 21 which he would like filed in this action to the Court.1 The intended filings are handwritten 22 on “homemade” paper, which, it appears, are large envelopes taped together to make 23 sheets of paper. 24 25 26 27 This format is clearly unacceptable for filing with the Court. The sheets of paper do 1 The Court notes that this action is m erely in the screening phase. At this stage in the proceedings, it is not necessary for Plaintiff to file any other docum ents as he does not have any pending deadlines and, m ost likely, will not have any or be required to file anything until after the Court screens his Com plaint. 1 not comply with the size guidelines governed by Local Rule 130. Thus, Plaintiff’s filing is 2 rejected for filing. 3 Plaintiff is free to attempt to file again. However, for all filings he must comply with 4 5 Local Rule 130 not only for the size requirements of the sheets of paper, but also the 6 legibility requirement as Plaintiff’s handwritten pleadings, often using pencil, are nearly 7 illegible. Local Rule 130 governs the general format of documents 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (a) Electronically-Filed Documents. Documents electronically filed shall be created and formatted to comply, in appearance and presentation both in an electronic format and when printed, with the requirements for conventionally-filed paper documents. (b) Conventionally-Filed Documents and Courtesy Copies. All documents presented for conventional filing or lodging and the chambers courtesy copies shall be on white, unglazed opaque paper of good quality with numbered lines in the left margin, 8-1/2” x 11” in size, and shall be flat, unfolded (except where necessary for presentation of exhibits), firmly bound at the top left corner, pre-punched with two (2) holes (approximately 1/4” diameter) centered 2-3/4” apart, 1/2” to 5/8” from the top edge of the document, and shall comply with all other applicable provisions of these Rules. Matters contained thereon shall be presented by typewriting, printing, photographic or offset reproduction, or other clearly legible process, without erasures or interlining that materially defaces the document, and shall appear on one side of each sheet only. 18 19 20 21 (c) Spacing. Documents shall be double-spaced except for the identification of counsel, title of the action, category headings, footnotes, quotations, exhibits and descriptions of real property. Quotations of more than fifty (50) words shall be indented. 22 (d) Numbering. Each page shall be numbered consecutively at the bottom and shall provide a brief description of the document on the same line. 23 Plaintiff’s filings must be double-spaced. The formatting must be reasonably similar 24 to the formatting of this Order: 28 double-spaced lines written in 12-point font on 8.5 x 11 25 inch paper with 1-inch margins on the top, left, and right sides of the paper and a 0.5-inch 26 27 margin on the bottom. The Court will allow modest deviations from these standard 1 formatting requirements to accommodate the document drafting resources, or lack thereof, 2 at Plaintiff’s disposal. However, any significant deviation will result in rejection the filings. 3 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s filings are REJECTED and will not be filed in this action. The 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Clerk is to return said documents to Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1j0bbc August 1, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?