Mordoff v. City of Modesto et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION and ORDER For Plaintiff to File a Second Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/8/2011. (Second Amended Complaint due by 12/9/2011, Defendants Motion for Dismissal currently set for hearing 12/12/2011 is vacated.) (Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 LAWRENCE T. NIERMEYER BAR NO. 157440 1301 ‘K’ STREET, SUITE H MODESTO, CA 95354 TELEPHONE (209) 574-9447 FACSIMILE (209) 574-9445 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JOSHUA MORDOFF CASE NO. 1:11-CV-01039-AWI-DLB 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 vs. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CITY OF MODESTO, MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, MODESTO POLICE OFFICER JAMES ROKAITIS, MODESTO POLICE CHIEF MICHAEL HARDEN, JAMES ROKAITIS individually and DOES 1-20 INCULUSIVE. Defendants, ____________________________________/ 20 21 WHERE AS, Plaintiff JOSHUA MORDOFF seeks to withdraw any individual claims 22 against MODESTO POLICE CHIEF MICHAEL HARDEN and amend his complaint in 23 response to Defendants 12(b) Motion to Dismiss; 24 The parties stipulate as follows: 25 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff JOSHUA MORDOFF, 26 represented by Lawrence T. Niermeyer, Esq., and Defendants CITY OF MODESTO, 27 MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES ROKAITIS, and MODESTO POLICE CHIEF 28 MICHAEL HARDEN, all represented by James F. Wilson, Esq.: 1 1. 2 Plaintiff JOSHUA MORDOFF may file a Second Amended Complaint on or before December 9, 2011. 3 2. 4 removed from calendar. Defendants Motion for Dismissal currently set for hearing December 12, 2011 be 5 6 Dated: 12-7-11 ______/S/_________________________ LAWRENCE T. NIERMEYER, Esq Dated: 12-7-11 _______/S/________________________ JAMES F. WILSON, Esq 7 8 9 10 11 12 ORDER 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: 16 /s/ Dennis December 8, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 17 3b142a 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 L. Beck

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?