Mordoff v. City of Modesto et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER For Plaintiff to File a Second Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/8/2011. (Second Amended Complaint due by 12/9/2011, Defendants Motion for Dismissal currently set for hearing 12/12/2011 is vacated.) (Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
LAWRENCE T. NIERMEYER
BAR NO. 157440
1301 âKâ STREET, SUITE H
MODESTO, CA 95354
TELEPHONE (209) 574-9447
FACSIMILE (209) 574-9445
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
JOSHUA MORDOFF
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-01039-AWI-DLB
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
vs.
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
PLAINTIFF TO FILE A SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
CITY OF MODESTO, MODESTO POLICE
DEPARTMENT, MODESTO POLICE
OFFICER JAMES ROKAITIS, MODESTO
POLICE CHIEF MICHAEL HARDEN, JAMES
ROKAITIS individually and DOES 1-20
INCULUSIVE.
Defendants,
____________________________________/
20
21
WHERE AS, Plaintiff JOSHUA MORDOFF seeks to withdraw any individual claims
22
against MODESTO POLICE CHIEF MICHAEL HARDEN and amend his complaint in
23
response to Defendants 12(b) Motion to Dismiss;
24
The parties stipulate as follows:
25
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff JOSHUA MORDOFF,
26
represented by Lawrence T. Niermeyer, Esq., and Defendants CITY OF MODESTO,
27
MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES ROKAITIS, and MODESTO POLICE CHIEF
28
MICHAEL HARDEN, all represented by James F. Wilson, Esq.:
1
1.
2
Plaintiff JOSHUA MORDOFF may file a Second Amended Complaint on or
before December 9, 2011.
3
2.
4
removed from calendar.
Defendants Motion for Dismissal currently set for hearing December 12, 2011 be
5
6
Dated: 12-7-11
______/S/_________________________
LAWRENCE T. NIERMEYER, Esq
Dated: 12-7-11
_______/S/________________________
JAMES F. WILSON, Esq
7
8
9
10
11
12
ORDER
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
Dated:
16
/s/ Dennis
December 8, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
17
3b142a
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
L. Beck
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?