Reed et al v. City of Modesto et al

Filing 178

Stipulation and ORDER to Dismiss Claims of B. R. and Fourth Amendment Claims, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/24/2015. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 66879) THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Center 7677 Oakport St., Suite 1120 Oakland, CA 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 Email: john.burris@johnburrislaw.com STEVEN R. YOURKE, ESQ. (State Bar No. 118506) LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN YOURKE 1048 Larkin Street, No. 11 San Francisco, CA 94109 (415) 424-0022 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Susan E. Coleman (SBN 171832) E-mail: scoleman@bwslaw.com Nathan A. Oyster (SBN 225307) E-mail: noyster@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2953 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF MODESTO and OFFICER RON ZIYA 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BRIAN REED, B.R., a minor, by her guardian ad litem, Roxanne Sayer, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation, Chief of Police HARDEN, in his individual capacity; Police Officer RON ZIYA, Police Officer CAELI KOEHLER, in their individual and official capacities, 27 Case No. 1:11-cv-01083-AWI-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIMS OF B.R. AND FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS Trial Date: Time: Courtroom: April 28, 2015 8:30 a.m. 2 Hon. Anthony W. Ishii Defendants. 28 B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENS EN , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES LA #4812-3035-6515 v1 -1- 1:11-CV-01083-AWI-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIMS OF B.R. AND 14TH AMENDMENT CLAIMS 1 Plaintiffs BRIAN REED and B.R., through her guardian ad litem, 2 ROXANNE SAYER (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants CITY OF 3 MODESTO and OFFICER RON ZIYA (hereinafter “Defendants”) hereby stipulate 4 to the following: 5 6 1. SAYER, are to be dismissed with prejudice. 7 8 All claims of B.R., through her guardian ad litem, ROXANNE 2. The second claim for relief, which alleges a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, is to be dismissed with prejudice. 9 3. Each side is to bear their own costs and fees as to the dismissal 10 identified in paragraphs 1 and 2. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 13 Dated: April 23, 2015 14 15 Law Office of John Burris Law Office of Steven Yourke By: /s/ [As authorized on John L. Burris Steven R. Yourke Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 17 18 19 Dated: April 23, 2015 20 Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP By: /s/ Nathan A. Oyster Susan E. Coleman Nathan A. Oyster 21 22 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF MODESTO and OFFICER RON ZIYA 23 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENS EN , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES LA #4812-3035-6515 v1 -2- 1:11-CV-01083-AWI-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIMS OF B.R. AND 14TH AMENDMENT CLAIMS 1 ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF B.R. AND FOURTEENTH 2 AMENDMENT CLAIMS 3 Having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss Claims of B.R. and 4 Fourteenth Amendment Claims, filed on April 23, 2015, and finding good cause 5 therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1. All claims of B.R., through her guardian ad litem, ROXANNE SAYER, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 2. The second claim for relief, which alleges a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 3. Each side is to bear their own costs and fees as to the dismissal identified in paragraphs 1 and 2. 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 24, 2015 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENS EN , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES LA #4812-3035-6515 v1 -3- 1:11-CV-01083-AWI-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIMS OF B.R. AND 14TH AMENDMENT CLAIMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?