Caranchini v. Cate et al

Filing 10

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why this Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to Obey Court 8 Order; Response Due within Eighteen Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/13/2011. Show Cause Response due by 11/3/2011. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

BENJAMIN M. CARANCHINI,

9
10
11

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-01089-AWI-DLB PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER

v.
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

12

(DOC. 8)

Defendants.

13

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN EIGHTEEN
DAYS
/

14
15

Plaintiff Benjamin M. Caranchini (“Plaintiff”) is formerly a California state prisoner.

16

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On July 5, 2011,

17

the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to either consent or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction in

18

this action. Doc 4. On August 23, 2011, the Court issued a second order regarding consent or

19

decline. Doc. 8. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not responded.

20

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to show cause within eighteen

21

(18) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure

22

to obey a court order. Failure to timely respond or otherwise show cause will result in a

23

recommendation of dismissal of this action.

24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
3b142a

October 13, 2011

/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1