Calloway v. Kelley et al

Filing 60

ORDER for Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why Entry of Default Should Not Be Entered Against Defendants Talisman and Fritz 57 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/4/14: 20-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. G. KELLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:11-cv-01090-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ENTRY OF DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANTS TALISMAN AND FRITZ [ECF No. 57] Plaintiff Jamisi Jermaine Calloway is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On December 13, 2013, the Court directed the United States Marshal to serve the complaint on Defendants Kelley, Talisman, Wang, Fritz, Schomer, Mazuk, Trinh, Bostanjian, and Syed. 21 On February 20, 2014, Defendants Kelley and Wang filed an answer to the complaint. 22 On August 14, 2014, the USM-285 service form was returned to the Court executed as to 23 Defendant Pascua, along with a waiver of service of the summons. On February 25, 2014, Defendants 24 Bostanjian and Syed filed an answer to the complaint. On February 27, 2014, Defendants Mazur and 25 Schomer filed an answer to the complaint. Defendants Talisman and Fritz have yet to make an 26 appearance in the action, despite the return of service executed by the U.S. Marshal. 27 28 Under Rule 4(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant who timely returns a waiver after being served with process has sixty days after the request was sent to serve an answer. 1 1 Here, the waiver of service of summons was served upon Defendants Marc Talisman and Melissa Fritz 2 on April 18, 2014, and an answer was due sixty days thereafter. 3 Based on the fact that Defendants Talisman and Fritz have now been effectively served and no 4 answers have been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing within 5 twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order why entry of default should not be entered. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 September 4, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?