Munguia et al v. Bekins Van Lines, LLC et al

Filing 66

Stipulation Of DISMISSAL With Prejudice; ORDER Thereon; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/11/2013. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ROGER A. DREYER, ESQ. / SBN: 095462 STEPHEN F. DAVIDS, ESQ. / SBN: 105097 DREYER BABICH BUCCOLA WOOD CAMPORA, LLP 20 Bicentennial Circle Sacramento, CA 95826 Telephone: (916) 379-3500 Facsimile: (916) 379-3599 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, WILLIAM WRIGHT and JOANNE WRIGHT 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM WRIGHT, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 Case No.: 1:11-cv-01134 SKO v. 14 15 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER THEREON [F.R.C.P. Rule 41 (a)(1); Local Rule 160] BEKINS VAN LINES, LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties of this action, through their 18 designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed in its entirety, with 19 prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1). 20 DATED: September 10, 2013 DREYER BABICH BUCCOLA WOOD CAMPORA, LLP 21 By: 22 23 24 25 DATED: September 10, 2013 /s/ Roger A. Dreyer ROGER A. DREYER Attorneys for Plaintiffs, WILLIAM WRIGHT and JOANNE WRIGHT HARDY ERICH BROWN & WILSON 26 By: 27 28 /s/ Richard L. Alley RICHARD L. ALLEY Attorney for Defendants, BEKINS VAN LINES, LLC and ESTATE OF MYRON BOJSZUK -1- Stipulation of Dismissal 1 ORDER 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the that the above-captioned action is dismissed in its 3 entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1) and based 4 upon the stipulation of the parties. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9 September 11, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?