Masterson v. Killen et al
Filing
160
ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to Consent to or Decline United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction within Fifteen Days,signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/18/17. (Case Management Deadline: 15-Day Deadline) (Attachments: # 1 consent/decline form)(Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL MASTERSON,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
S. KILLEN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:11-cv-01179-DAD-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
CONSENT TO OR DECLINE UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JURISDICTION WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS
Plaintiff Daniel Masterson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
On August 17, 2017, the District Judge issued an order adopting findings and
20
recommendations in this matter, and ordered that this action would survive summary judgment and
21
proceed upon the following claims:
22
Hampson and Killen for retaliation against plaintiff based on his job reassignment; (2) Plaintiff’s First
23
Amendment claim against Defendants Santoro and Rodriguez for retaliation against Plaintiff with
24
respect to threats with Ad-Seg placement on August 11, 2011; (3) Plaintiff’s conspiracy claim against
25
Defendants Hampson, Killen, Rodriguez, and Santoro with respect to retaliation against Plaintiff; and
26
(4) Plaintiff’s state law claim for personal property loss arising out of an alleged retaliatory cell search
27
on December 27, 2011, ordered by Defendant Killen. (ECF No. 159.) As a result, this this case is now
28
ready to proceed to trial on those claims.
(1) Plaintiff’s First Amendment claim against Defendants
1
1
On August 9, 2011, Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge
2
to conduct all proceedings in this matter, including entering a judgment in this case, pursuant to 28
3
U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 6.) Defendants previously declined such jurisdiction. (ECF No. 40.)
4
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District Judge
5
caseload in the entire nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case and all other
6
civil cases in a timely manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’ needs and
7
expectations may be met as expeditiously as desired. As multiple trials are now being set to begin
8
upon the same date, parties may find their case trailing with little notice before the trial begins when
9
the case is heard before a United States District Judge. The law requires the Court give any criminal
10
case priority over civil trials and other matters, and the Court must proceed with criminal trials even if
11
a civil trial is older or was set earlier. Continuances of civil trials under these circumstances will no
12
longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated finding of good cause. If multiple trials are
13
scheduled to begin on the same day, this civil trial will trail day to day or week to week until
14
completion of any criminal case or older civil case.
15
The parties are advised of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all
16
proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials, including
17
entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73,
18
and Local Rule 305. The Court will direct the Clerk of the Court to provide Defendants with the
19
Court’s standard form to consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Within fifteen (15) days
20
of this order’s date of service, Defendants shall either consent to or decline Magistrate Judge
21
jurisdiction by filling out the requisite forms and returning them to the Court.
22
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1.
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send to Defendants a copy of the
24
consent/decline form and the instructions for consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction; and
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
2.
1
2
Within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants shall
complete and return the Consent or Request for Reassignment form.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
August 18, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?